Barack Obama, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal do not meet Framers Requirements for Natural Born Citizens…


By Jeffrey Hardin

What the heck is wrong with you people…What?
Obama, Cruz, Rubio and Juindal are Citizens at Birth
They are -NOT- Natural Born Citizens…

Wasn’t Obama good enough a lesson for any of you, why our Framers were so bloody strict with the Natural Born Provision…

Any American who would or have enabled, encouraged or supported any Four of these men for the candidacy of the office of the Presidency of these here United States of America, than you’re a Bloody Traitor.

Try for a moment, circulating this in your brain circuitry…

Queen Noor, also known as Noor Al-Hussein, is the window of King Hussein of Jordan…A devout Muslim now deceased..

Together King Hussein and Queen Noor have generated 4 children….Princess Raiyah bint Al Hussein, Prince Hamzah bin Al Hussein, Princess Iman bint Al Hussein, Prince Hashim Al Hussein

Queen Nor is an Native Born American citizen of two American Parents who are also citizens of the United States of America, who became a Muslim convert and each of their children have been practicing Muslims from birth…

My question is, would you allow them to run for the Presidency of the United States of American, or would you protest them as you did Baraq Hussein Obama????

Keep in mind all of you, since many of you are encouraging Senator Cruz, Senator Rubio, and Senator Jindal to run for the presidency of the United States, they according to YOURS, the Democrats and Republicans idea (redefinition) of Natural Born Citizen are ELIGIBLE, and since Queen Noors and King Husseins children fall under the very same Natural Born definitions as these Senators do, then they too, are ELIGIBLE for our highest office?

Remember…Queen Noor is an American by birth… If Barack Obama and Ted Cruz are both eligible to be President and if all it takes to be President of the United States is just one American parent [singular] -not- parents [plural]…. then by what legal means could we prevent Queen Noor’s Jordanian born Muslim children from running for President if they wanted to? She has four children. And they are all devout MUSLIMS…..

As will the 12 million Amnestied Mexicans anchor baby’s…

Rubio and Jindal are not Natural Natives, they are Citizens at Birth…We often refer to those like them as anchor baby’s because neither parent were Naturalized Citizens when they were born upon American soil….

Rubio & Jindal are Citizens at Birth and their parents are Naturalized Citizens.

That being the case, by redefining the requirements our framers made for Natural Born status….

The amnestied parent-parents of the many anchor baby’s in America will be Naturalized making them American Citizens of the United States, and since their children were born on American soil, they, by YOURS the Democrats and Republicans redefinition of Natural Born will be eligible to run for our highest office…

Do you really believe our Founding Fathers would have allowed this???

I don’t know how to make it any clearer, the importance that we require the strictest definition of Natural Born…

Why would we want any less than, a Person Born of this Country of Two Parents who are American Citizens as our President, to ensure that he and or she is not influenced by outside forces?

I would have thought that Obama was good enough a lesson for all of us, of what an outsider can do to damage this Republic, and that Patriot Citizens would be moved to be more aggressive in requiring their President be eligible….But by the massive support I see of Cruz and Rubio getting, I can see that we have not learned anything…

Think about it for a moment…12 million amnestied border jumpers and their anchor baby’s being eligible to Preside over your CHILDREN & GRANDCHILDREN….

How Dare any of you do this to them…

I have read the Article II document and the many other articles given to guide and help me to better understanding this and it cannot be made any clearer, its not a difficult read if you put it into context with prior Constitutional laws, what’s more, the very ones who argue its Constitutionality most often have a biased or self driven reason behind it…

Also, it but takes little Historical research to show our Founding Fathers intent and the practices of law prior to the written Constitution…

The basis for the requirement of Natural Born Citizen were made very clear by our Founding Fathers as a qualification to become President was to eliminate foreign influence at the highest level of our government. The Founding fathers intent was to insure that the security of our nation would not devolve to anyone with loyalties other than to the USA.

People just don’t understand that when our Constitution was written we were still under threat of invasion, as was the case with the wars against Britain in 1812-1814 some 36 years after the Revolutionary war…

The founding Fathers knew that Britain still held quite a lot of influence over Her new government, and that they needed to provide a protection against that influence and installed the Natural Born provision …

It was as you said earlier made strict for a very good reason and we are encouraging an unconstitutional allowance because these fools are blinded by their hero worshiping of a damn politician…


It clearly states that [You] must be born of TWO PARENTS who are American Citizens at the time of your Birth upon American soil to meet the full requirement of Natural Born Citizen…

Two Parents [plural], not Parent [singular] who are Citizens [plural] no Citizen [singular] of the United States and born upon sovereign soil…

Ted Cruz was born in Canada. His mother was born in Delaware. Cruz’ father was born in Cuba, lived in the U.S. on a student visa, went to Canada and became a Canadian citizen. But, he did not become a naturalized U.S. citizen until 2005, 35 years after his son Ted Cruz was born. Ted Cruz by definition is a U.S. citizen at birth, but not a natural born citizen.


Rubio was born in May 1971 in Miami, Florida. His parents Mario Rubio and Oria Garcia who were Cuban Nationals did not become U.S. citizens until 4 years after their Nationalization on November 1975. Rubio is a U.S. citizen at birth (ANCHOR BABY), but “is not a natural born citizen.”
Neither of his parents were American Citizens when he was BORN….
Senator Bobby “Piyush” Jindal’s parents arrived in America on Feb 1, 1971, and just over four months later, on June 10, 1971, Piyush Jindal was born at the Woman’s Hospital in Baton Rouge.. Senator Jindal’s parents were not U.S. citizens at the time of his birth; they were both here on green cards. His mother became a Naturalized citizen in 1976, and his father in 1986.
Senator Jindal is a U.S. citizen at birth, but, he is not a natural born citizen. Many including myself some years ago didn’t understand the differences between the two, and they have two very distinctive interpretations to law.


Ted Cruz Decides to Run for President – Two Constitutional Wrongs don’t make the Texas Senator’s Presidential Aspirations Right for America.
http://lessgovisthebestgov.com/blog/ted-cruz-decides-to-run-for-president-two-constitutional-wrongs-dont-make-the-texas-senators-presidential-aspirations-right.html

Our Founding Fathers knew exactly what they wanted and worded it so as to eliminate all Foreign influence…

Absolute Proof Founders Translated French Word ‘Naturels’ to English Term ‘Natural Born’
http://www.scribd.com/…/Absolute-Proof-Founders…

“The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of [parents] who are [citizens].” – Law of Nations

That is the exact, written definition of Natural Born Citizen that the Founders had in the reference book they used for over a decade prior to writing the Constitution.

That’s what many are missing, or refusing to address – and are getting it so very wrong. So wrong in fact that it will endanger our future generations of children to foreign powers…

Those just like Obama…

Barack Obama, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio cannot legally be President because, at least, all of them were born to a Father who was not a US Citizen at the time of their births.

Please give these articles a good reading, they are very informative and reliable.

Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defines a Natural Born Citizen in1789 In defining an [Article II “natural born Citizen]…
http://www.scribd.com/…/Founder-and-Historian-David

Defining Natural-Born Citizen by P.A. Madison on November 18th, 2008
http://www.federalistblog.us/…/natural-born_citizen…/

http://www.federalistblog.us/…/natural-born_citizen_defined/

Source: Attorney Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
March 13, 2015 http://puzo1.blogspot.com

Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defined Natural Born Citizenship in 1789 – by Atty Mario Apuzzo
http://www.scribd.com/…/Founder-and-Historian-David-Ramsay-…

A Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What & For How Long?
https://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/a-congressi…/

The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/natural-born-citizen-clause-req…

Senator Ted Cruz Is Not a “Natural Born Citizen” and Therefore Not Eligible to Be President
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/senator-ted-cruz-is-not-natural…

The Fallacies of Congressional Legislative Attorney Jack Maskell’s Definition of a “Natural Born Citizen”
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/the-fallacies-of-congressional.…

Birthright Citizenship in the United States: A Global Comparison
http://www.cis.org/birthright-…

See: Publius Huldah’s important article on this subject…http://newswithviews.com/Publius/huldah110.htm

Defining Natural-Born Citizen: The Debate Over Who Qualifies To Run For President…
http://ivn.us/2013/08/13/defining-natural-born-citizen/


https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2015/03/25/truth-the-whole-truth-nothing-but-the-truth-cruz-control/

Cruz Control – Part II
https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2015/03/27/cruz-control-part-ii/

Obama never certified by Hawaii Democratic Party
https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/obama-never-certified-by-hawaii-democratic-party/

Trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “natural born Citizens (NBC)” are “Citizens at birth (CAB)” but not all “CAB” are “NBC”!
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab-are-nbc/


Since the founders and framers of the US Constitution clearly moved to block naturalized US citizens from the presidency due to their previous allegiances to foreign sovereignty’s, wouldn’t it be reasonable to assume this was also their intent in using the “natural born citizen” phrase i.e. to block US citizens born with allegiances to foreign sovereignty’s from the presidency?

Furthermore, At the time the Constitution was written, “Natural Born Citizen” had a written definition that was well understood by all involved. It is in the reference book on international law used by Congress and by universities and law schools all around the nation:

“The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” – Law of Nations

There’s no need to play guessing games when you can look it up in the same reference the authors of the Constitution did.

This book is still in print and is still used by our Supreme Court today for Constitutional cases.

That is the problem the Founders realized, after Hamilton first proposed the Presidential requirement as “born a Citizen”. John Jay warned that it allowed someone born a Citizen to also be subject to another nation, bringing a dangerous conflict of interest into the Presidency.

So, they eliminated “born a Citizen” (which is what 8 USC 1401 s about) and instead substituted “Natural Born Citizen”, which has a very clear definition:

“The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” – Law of Nations

John Jay’s letter to George Washington dated 25 Jul 1787:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/is-being-born-citizen-of…

By ensuring the child was not born under foreign jurisdiction or to a foreign parent, they prevented those foreign claims over the child.

Barack Obama, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal are all disqualified under the qualifications of Article II and do not meet the requirements to hold the Office of the Presidency of the United States of America…

Obama knows this, Cruz knows this, Rubio knows this and Jindal too, is aware of this, which is one of the reasons why Obama has had teams of lawyers fighting to block resolution of his eligibility all these years. As long as it’s not resolved, he can continue pretending to be President…

A Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What & For How Long?
https://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/a-congressional-natural-born-citizen-parts-i-ii-iii/

Presidential Eligibility Tutorial
http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

Both U.S. drones and manned aircraft set for combat missions in Iraq || Posted by WorldTribune.com


WASHINGTON — The United States has deployed combat unmanned aerial vehicles in Iraq.

The Defense Department said the U.S. military has used both manned and unmanned aircraft amid the war against Al Qaida’s Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.

Pentagon_Press_Secretary_Rear_Adm._John_Kirby_briefs_reporters_at_the_Pentagon_140205-D-BW835-113-300x199
Pentagon spokesman John Kirby. /DoD photo by Erin A. Kirk-Cuomo

The Pentagon said some of the unidentified UAVs were armed to
protect U.S. special operations forces in the field.

“The reason that some of those aircraft are armed is primarily for force
protection reasons now that we have introduced into the country some
military advisers whose objective will be to operate outside the confines of
the [U.S.] embassy,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said.

The post Both U.S. drones and manned aircraft set for combat missions in Iraq appeared first on World Tribune.

 Read Full Article »

No Speech Can Fix This || Amy Payne


President Obama has been on a foreign tour. How’s it going on the world stage?

Probably not so well when New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd is accusing him of “whining” and “whiffing.”

Dowd’s eviscerating assessment of Obama’s foreign policy is timely.

“It doesn’t feel like leadership,” she said yesterday. “It doesn’t feel like you’re in command of your world.”

Why does this matter right now?

WW3_v2

Is the U.S. Being Colonized By Communist China? || by Tom DeWeese


8a241ab318da7eb40c4a384a9083de3a_M

For the past few decades the Communist regime of China has been driving toward world supremacy, both economically and militarily. The regime’s main target has been, and is, the United States of America. China’s plan to grab power has been clever and unprecedented, seeking victory without firing a shot, reducing its targets to mere frogs in a boiling pot.

Pundits and politicians alike, when excusing their strategic dealings with China, are quick to remind their audiences that today’s China is a “centuries-old civilization” rich in tradition and ancient religious discipline. A Confucian civilization that is still upset over wrongdoings during the European colonization period.

Read More Here;  
Is the U.S. Being Colonized By Communist China?

America’s Treaty Allies: Worth Going to War Over || David Santoro | COURTESY: LtCol Mark A McDonald, USMC (Ret) MILINET


MILINET

obama_pd_042514

In a recent essay, Justin Logan asks the fundamental question about U.S. alliance commitments: does the existence of such commitments automatically create an interest worth going to war over for the United States?

Explaining that no one in Washington sees any interest in going to war against Russia over the current crisis in Ukraine, Logan wonders whether the United States should contemplate doing so for countries where it has even smaller interests, such as the Baltic states, only because they, unlike Ukraine, are U.S. allies under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). He argues that Washington would be misguided to waste blood and treasure just to honor what he refers to as a “sheet of paper,” and warns against the danger of forging alliances in places where there is no interest that warrants war.

Read More Here;    http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/americas-treaty-allies-worth-going-war-over-10346

New US sanctions on Russian officials, companies || By JULIE PACE


Barack Obama, Benigno Aquino

MANILA, Philippines (AP) — The United States levied new sanctions Monday on seven Russian government officials, as well as 17 companies with links to Vladimir Putin’s close associates, as the Obama administration seeks to pressure the Russian leader to deescalate the crisis in Ukraine.

The U.S. sanctions were implemented in coordination with the European Union, which moved to slap visa bans and asset freezes on 15 individuals alleged to be involved with stoking instability in eastern Ukraine.

Read More Here;  http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/AS_UNITED_STATES_RUSSIA?SITE=VANOV&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-04-28-04-52-49

5000 legal students in Florida to lose their tuition to illegals


5000 legal students in Florida to lose their tuition to illegals.

5000 legal students in Florida to lose their tuition to illegals