America’s Champion…Donald Trump, The American People Have Voted To Make America Great Again.


trump lion

What really concerns me today, are the priority’s of my fellow Patriots, we’re not prioritizing important issues and confronting them, nor are the many of us addressing the threats coming from Unconstitutional Candidates….The ones who are trying to address this are few, and we need more voices.

We have TWO Candidates like Obama who are not eligible for the Presidency, but despite Constitutional restraints are being allowed to run in this general election and we have the Establishment covering for them…They feel so threatened now by Donald Trumps candidacy and our support of him that they even enlisted the help of the TWICE failed Rino, Willard the Rat Romney…

Why aren’t Americans realizing and addressing Marco Antonio Rubio’s birth to TWO Cuban Citizens -NOT- TWO American Citizens. He is Constitutionally barred from the Presidency…

Or Rafael Cruz’s birth to One American Parent -NOT- TWO American Citizens, who was also born on foreign soil, -NOT- American soil.

Their INELIGIBILITY like Obama’s would free them up from any Constitutional Constraints just as Obama has been freed…This is exactly why Obama is able to write so many Unconstitutional Executive Orders…

Also and more importantly are those arguing that Marco Rubio has 14 amendment birth rights. Thus making him eligible….

Fact…..The 14th Amendment does not define Birth Right Statuses to those born of Foreign Parents. Rubio was born to two Cuban Citizens.
Fact…..The 14th Amendment does not define Natural Born Statuses to those born of foreign parent/parents or those born on foreign soil.
Fact…..The 14th Amendment can only define the Naturalization, Immigration, Nationalization of someones Citizenship….Not Natural Born Statuses.
Fact…..All Natural Born Citizens are Citizens @Birth…
Fact…..Not All Citizens @Birth are Natural Born Citizens…

I implore my fellow Patriots to please make this your arguing points. This more than anything else is of the utmost importance…WHY?

Because those who are arguing that Marco Antonio Rubio are Eligible, are also arguing that the 10+ million anchor baby’s born to illegal aliens are also Eligible for the Presidency….

Those arguing for Rafael Cruz’s and Barack Obama’s [unconstitutional] eligibility, are also arguing for those like Queen Noors and King Hussein of Jordan’s Four devout Muslim Children Princess Iman bint Hussein, Hamzah bin Hussein, Princess Raiyah bint Hussein, Prince Hashim Al Hussein….

You are also arguing for the eligibility for the children of the Royal Family of Princess Grace Kelly and Prince Ranier of Monaco, Albert II, Prince of Monaco, Caroline, Princess of Hanover, Princess Stéphanie of Monaco….

When you argue for McCain’s [unconstitutional] eligibility you are arguing for those like Valerie Jarret to run as well, imagine that, she was born and raised in Iran by two Muslim hugging Marxist socialist left wing progressives who would love nothing more than to destroy this nation all because Barack Obama was unconstitutionally allowed to hold our highest office and it encouraged them to run as well.

These foreign Influences if allowed into our highest offices will have a huge negative impact on the direction this Nation will take in the future, affecting our future generations, our policies and even changing laws that will protect them from your criticism of them.

This will not only encourage the redefining of Constitutional Eligibility, but also enable over 10 million Anchor Baby’s to meet the conditions of Marco’s, Piyush and Nimrata’s Unconstitutional Eligibility Status when their parents are either amnestied or become Naturalized Citizens.

It doesn’t take a very intelligent person to realize the ramifications of these allowances and the dangerous precedent this encourages….It will dramatically change the dynamics and direction of this Nation as a Constitutional Republic and if not addressed now, no one will be able to stop it in the future short of another bloody Civil War…

Barack Hussein Obama (Barry Soetoro) was the first Ineligible President to hold the office of the presidency in 200 years…..

The very moment he was elected this encouraged Rafael Cruz who is also Ineligible to run for the Presidency, he too is Constitutionally barred from holding the offices of the presidency’s, this encouraged Marco Rubio to run when he seen no one questioning his candidacy, and that encouraged Piyush Jindal to run.

PLEASE!!! Ask yourself this, why after 200 years of Natural Born precedence are this Government now allowing Ineligible Candidates not only to run for the presidency, but to hold the offices of the Presidency’s???

There’s actually a very easy answer to this….One but has to look at the freedoms they have lost in the past 7+ years under an Ineligible Barack Hussein Obama Presidency to know the answer to that….

We have suffered unconstitutional Gay Marriages, Forced Gay compliance’s (baking cakes and performing gay weddings on private property), force Obamacare, the unconstitutional circumvention of congress and the senate, the circumvention of Constitutional laws, unconstitutional wars, unconstitutional gun restrictions and regulations, unconstitutional and lawless immigration and amnesty, unconstitutionally forced federal laws that just recently took the life of an innocent Rancher, the treasonous hiring of Islamic cabinet members in our most secured departments, forced closures of businesses not in compliance to unlawful regulations and statutes, the restrictions upon our freedoms of speech, unconstitutional restraints against our liberties such as public prayer and evangelism, unconstitutional fines for not having insurances…

All of these actions and the many many more that were enabled by this President’s Ineligibility….

And here we are once again, many of you supporting, championing for, defending and arguing for TWO more Article II Section I Clause IV Constitutionally barred Candidates for the offices of the Presidency and very few Americans are addressing it….The ones who do address their ineligibility are being attacked and ridiculed by so called Patriots, pseudo Conservatives and champions for the Constitution.

Article II Section I Clause V:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

We are not focused nor are our priority’s in order….We must for the safety and security of this Nation argue against both Rafael Cruz’s and Marco Rubio’s Unconstitutional Candidacy’s and Ineligibility’s, that and not one thing more should be addressed until the American people are assured they have a Constitutional President leading their Nation and not foreign influences….

To make anything else a priority will be absolutely lost to the real threat we are facing today and these issues will surely force our grand children to confront and address them in the future, and it will most likely be to late for them by then.

The surrendering of our Nation to foreign powers are being enabled and encouraged by Ineligible Presidency’s…….

Donald Trump is a good man, more importantly to me, he is a also a Christian, under all his bravado and loudness, he is a proven American Patriot… Mr Trump has proven time and again his Patriotism and love for his fellow Americans through not only his compassion for those in need, but is passion to lead us out of this nightmare….

When he speaks, he speaks compassionately for the American People, he speaks passionately of things already set within our own hearts, its not that he is saying anything new to us, but that he is saying them louder than we ever could possibly dream of, and this comes natural to Mr Trump because they are entrenched within his own heart as well…

These elitist and establishment hucksters have misread us completely…We are not angry out of control citizens out for blood, we aren’t stupid Brown Shirts, we are not ignorant racist in the manner that Glen Beck, Mark Levin, Megyn Kelly, Nimrata Haley, Marco Rubio, Rafael Cruz, Dana Loesch or any of the many others who are attacking us for our support of Donald Trump has made us out to be….

Donald Trump’s supporters are Intelligent, well informed and hard working Patriotic Americans…We are in control and focused and our votes in the Primary are proof of that, as are our actions during Donald’s many rallies…We are united under his Patriotism, both Blacks and Whites, Asians and Latino’s who have a mutual love for the other as color blind Americans.

We understand the desperate need for an American Champion and strong leader, and that Champion, that strong leadership can only be found in Donald Trump.

He is the Only One who is stating that he wants to Make America Great Again, while the others speak only about and are championing for immigrants and amnesty, both of which threatens not only our security, but our economy and jobs and most especially and importantly, the future’s of this Nation and our grand children….

Americans…..We have a choice to make and you best make sure yours is the right one….

Its either or….An America or a New World Order….Its your Choice, as for myself, I was born to Fight for America..

If you are still undecided, please follow the the link I’ve provided below…These are Mr Trumps Agenda’s, his policies…He has voted on a straight Republican ticket since 1989, he is pro-life and pro-2cd amendment…Do not allow yourself to be mislead and misinformed…

Vote to Make America Great Again, cast your primary and electoral ballot’s for Donald Trump 2016.

american-flag-eagle-transparent-gif-wide_design

Donald Trump On The Issues…
2016 Presidential Candidates.

http://www.ontheissues.org/Donald_Trump.htm

Advertisements

Redefining Natural Born: Creating American Dynasties With Foreign Citizens.


The Rafael Cruz and Marco Supporters just as the Obama voters had in 2007 and 2011 are encouraging and enabling Ineligible candidates to run for our highest offices of the Presidency and Vice Presidency…

 

How can you as Americans live with your betrayals knowing it will destroy everything this Nations Sons & Daughters have Sacrificed to Protect.

 

As examples only….Grace Kelly never gave up her US citizenship. Albert II of Monaco was a natural born US citizen, Queen Hussein‘s very devout Muslim children just as the offspring of these others could easily become eligible under the circumstances you have allowed Rafael Cruz and these other candidates under the new definitions of Natural Born to run under, as can thousands more other radical foreigners whose very own situations mirror Rafael Cruz’s and Marco Rubios citizenship’s.

 

 

And here you are today attempting to carry their offspring over the threshold of our White House….

 

I think not.

 

As an American Patriot….Who is firmly committed to GOD and COUNTRY and the Constitution that stands protective over Her citizens, I am going to do everything in my power to help destroy Rafael Cruz’s and Marco Rubio’s chances of ever being carried over that threshold and becoming our next Presidents, their very own deceit and betrayals find them highly unworthy of ruling over this Nation, nor can they now be trusted, and I pray you’re not carrying either of them if they are elected, for you will be accountable for their final destruction upon this Nation…

 

One must be born upon American Soil to TWO Parents who are BOTH AMERICAN CITIZENS to be eligible for our highest offices of the Presidency and Vice Presidency…

Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jindal nor had Obama met any of these Requirements, and never will.

 

Mark Levin and Glen Beck would rather call American Patriots who are defending this Nations Constitution A-Holes and Idiots rather than admitting they are horribly wrong on this issue…

They and those like them are the problem we are facing today, not the solutions…

Do Not Be Swayed By Them….

 

If we lose our Constitutional Protections than we lose our Freedoms and Liberties, its that simple.

Trey Gowdy, Betrays the Constitution to Support Marco Rubio’s Ineligibility, As are many other Americans


And another Champion of the People and Constitution bites the Dust,,,,There is no candidate who is more clearly defined as Ineligible than Marco Rubio, and Trey Gowdy knows it…

4a2b5afc0a2af7e2710f386230f00f00

Neither Marco Rubio nor Bobby Jindals parents were American Citizens at the time of their births….I am so tired of seeing our Constitution Battered and Neglected in this Manner, if our Constitution is destroyed, than so will all our other Protections be destroyed…

All of our Protections people, including our precious and very fragile freedoms along with it.

Add in the Ineligible Ted Cruz and we have the makings for future Foreign Presidents….Don’t think so, than your a blind fool, that or terribly misinformed or outright compliant to our Nations destruction.

Why, for what other reason would any of you want to make allowances for Marco Rubio and those like himself except for your enabling them to further destroy this Nation and mind you, all of you….The Constitution of  The United States of America was not set up, structured, constructed and sealed AROUND each and every AMERICAN to protect THEM only, but to also protect this NATION from our enemies and from especially outside INFLUENCES that might destroy us from WITHIN, thus meaning FOREIGN Intrusions into our highest offices of the Presidency and Vice Presidency, our House and Senate which are all protected by these very FRAGILE PIECES of FOUNDING DOCUMENTS….

You and I, the American People, PATRIOTS all, are the Backbone of our CONSTITUTION  and we are seriously BROKEN…

Can you understand what “WE ARE BROKEN” means to us?

That Americans are the ones making these allowances, We the People, America’s Patriot’s are, and many others will soon follow our lead…Have they not already followed Barack Obama’s?

Once these allowances are made for those who are ineligible, no one will ever be able to challenge them again and that will have very serious and unprecedented consequences upon each and everyone of us as Americans and our Nation and especially our future generations, what we allow now will in fact impact their lives dramatically.

And we can stop the wrongful usurpation of this Nation today, its so insanely easy, simply don’t support them, don’t vote for them, let them know the reason you aren’t voting for or supporting them is because they do not meet our Framers requirements for the Presidency and make it known LOUD and clear so that other INELIGIBLE CANDIDATES know that as  her first and last Defenders American Patriots will not tolerate nor support their INELIGIBILITY.

CLOSE THIS DOOR and SEAL IT CLOSED TODAY, RIGHT NOW…!!!!

Close it now before this goes any further or mark my words, not only will you be culpable to your own destruction, but also the destruction of your family’s, your neighbors and this Nation’s security, as well as our future generations of Americans.

Has not Obama or his actions given any of you, any of you, a clear enough understanding or insight into what would follow after him if we continued to make allowances for ineligible candidates, redefining the requirements our Framers set in stone for our future Presidents eligibility?

Obama’s INELIGIBILITY has ENCOURAGE others with the same status to run for our highest office because they too think they can get away with it, and thus far, they have, and our corrupted do nothing traitorous Congress has cleared the path for him and that alone should concern all of you,  why would they enable Obama, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio to circumvent CONSTITUTIONAL LAW?

Why aren’t you Americans asking yourself that, or do you even care any more?

Where in our History has so many questionable Candidates ran for office, and at what time in our history has so many Ineligible candidates ran for our highest offices and don’t you for a moment suspect that something is amiss, that this comes right after Obama’s Illegal Presidency?

This is being Encouraged and you Americans, many of you God fearing Patriots are Allowing it by supporting them….

STOP IT, for the love of this Nation, STOP & THINK…Please research this for yourself.

If we continue to allow this, It won’t be long until we have Foreign President’s ruling over our children making law…THAT”S RIGHT, MAKING LAW, and don’t any of you dare tell me that will never happen when we have an Ineligible President now who is occupying our White House already, and he is MAKING LAWS that are aimed against AMERICANS and are favoring our Enemies….,don’t you even dare…

AND THAT MY DEAR PRECIOUS FRIENDS, are what they want, people who can work outside of our Constitution, the very same Constitution that many of you have professed you would die to protect, the very same document that many have already made the ultimate sacrifice for and the very same DOCUMENT you are now helping to destroy by allowing these Unconstitutional Exceptions into our highest offices….WHY??

NO ONE, not the President, not Congress, not the Senate nor Supreme Courts or States can change any of the wording within our Constitution to make them mean anything less than what our Founders interpreted them to mean….No Person or Persons have the Power to Do That.

So I have to ask, why are you trying to?

Am I to understand now that our Constitution is meaningless any more… Is that what you Patriots are Saying today?

Because that’s exactly what I am hearing and reading everywhere I go by the Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio supporters, as well as Bobby Jindals supporters before he stepped down, and if it doesn’t matter to you, then that breaks my heart…

Because, how can any of you who are supporting these Ineligible Candidates turn right around and honor and celebrate this Nation, our Constitution, Her Heroes and Veterans who sacrificed so much to protect this Nation and our Constitution with their lives, when you are now culpable in its very destruction…..

And, your doing it with a STRAIGHT FACE?

Blood & Soil, Descent & Territory = Natural Born

Anyone who is made a Citizen through an Act of Law is Naturalized…Not Natural Born.

People are mistaking Citizens at Birth with Natural Born, nor will they differentiate Citizen at Birth from Natural Born….

All Natural Born Natives are Citizens at Birth….
However, not all Citizens at Birth are Natural Born…

Anyone who is made a Citizen through an ACT of Law is a Naturalized Citizen and is not eligible for the Presidency.

A Natural Born Citizen would not have to renounce another Citizenship….Ted Cruz has.

One must be born upon American Soil to TWO Parents who are BOTH AMERICAN CITIZENS…To Meet The Natural Born Requirements to become eligible for the Presidency…

Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jindal nor had Obama met any of these Requirements for the Presidency, and they never will.

That Is A Fact, You Cannot Change Constitutional Law.

What we are seeing today with Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio as was the case of Barack OBAMA… IS,,,,The Willful Subversion of America’s Founding Document’s, By Both Sides of the Isle, and many of you are playing right into their hands!

Read Here: Trey Gowdy Twists Natural Born Citizen Qualification to Support Marco Rubio

http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/12/trey-gowdy-twists-natural-born-citizen-qualification-to-support-marco-rubio/

Sources:

Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defines a Natural Born Citizen in1789 In defining an [Article II “natural born Citizen]…

http://www.scribd.com/…/Founder-and-Historian-David...

 

Defining Natural-Born Citizen by P.A. Madison on November 18th, 2008

http://www.federalistblog.us/…/natural-born_citizen…/

 

 

http://www.federalistblog.us/…/natural-born_citizen_defined/

 

Source: Attorney Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

March 13, 2015 http://puzo1.blogspot.com

 

 

Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defined Natural Born Citizenship in 1789 – by Atty Mario Apuzzo

http://www.scribd.com/…/Founder-and-Historian-David-Ramsay-…

 

A Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What & For How Long?

https://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/a-congressi…/

 

The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/natural-born-citizen-clause-req…

 

Senator Ted Cruz Is Not a “Natural Born Citizen” and Therefore Not Eligible to Be President

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/senator-ted-cruz-is-not-natural…

 

The Fallacies of Congressional Legislative Attorney Jack Maskell’s Definition of a “Natural Born Citizen”

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/the-fallacies-of-congressional.…

 

Birthright Citizenship in the United States: A Global Comparison

http://www.cis.org/birthright-...

 

See: Publius Huldah’s important article on this subject…http://newswithviews.com/Publius/huldah110.htm

 

 

Defining Natural-Born Citizen: The Debate Over Who Qualifies To Run For President…http://ivn.us/2013/08/13/defining-natural-born-citizen/

 

 

Truth, the Whole Truth, & Nothing but the Truth – Cruz Control…

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2015/03/25/truth-the-whole-truth-nothing-but-the-truth-cruz-control/

 

 

Cruz Control – Part II

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2015/03/27/cruz-control-part-ii/

 

 

Obama never certified by Hawaii Democratic Party

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/obama-never-certified-by-hawaii-democratic-party/

 

Absolute Proof the Founders Knew and Accepted Vattel`s French “naturels” to mean “natural born” in English Before Constitution Was Written…

https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

 

Trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “natural born Citizens (NBC)” are “Citizens at birth (CAB)” but not all “CAB” are “NBC”!

https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab-are-nbc/

 

John Jay’s letter to George Washington dated 25 Jul 1787:

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/is-being-born-citizen-of...

ny_1789_jay

1775 Benjamin Franklin Wrote Vatel

A Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What & For How Long?

https://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/a-congressional-natural-born-citizen-parts-i-ii-iii/

 

CVJ5dUOUAAAWQt4.jpg large

 

Presidential Eligibility Tutorial

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

 

 

7 FAM 1131.6-3 …Not Citizens by “Naturalization”

(CT:CON-474; 08-19-2013) http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf

 

US Constitution

 

Cruz, Obama, Rubio nor Jindal meet any of these requirements…

 

Excellent article: Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/07/natural-born-citizen-matter-republicans-democrats/#3eTYHl4oG1Fsxbmj.99

 

Constitutional Qualifications  House of Representatives

4 Supreme Court Cases define “natural born citizen” | The Post & Email

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/

 

Vatel Eligibilty Natural Born

4 SUPREME COURT CASES DEFINE ‘NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'(Updated May 25, 2012) http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1308252582

 

 

 1790 Nationality Act repealed by the 1795 Immigration act

Check out sections 3 (correction of definition) -and- 4 (repeal of 1790 act).

http://www.indiana.edu/~kdhist/H105-documents-web/week08/naturalization1790.html

 

 

June 11, 2003, Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Ark., brought HJR 59. It was intended to “permit persons who are not natural born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 35 years, to be eligible to hold the offices of president and vice president.”

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:H.J.Res59:

 

 

Sept. 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., brought HJR67, which would have done the same as Snyder’s, only the requirement to be a citizen was lowered to 20 years.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:H.J.Res67:

 

 

Feb. 25, 2004, Sen. Don Nickles, R-Okla., brought S.B. 2128 to “try to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural born citizen requirement.” But it defined NBC as someone who was born in and is subject to the United States,” which was not the understanding of the framers of the Constitution.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:S2128:

 

 

Sept. 15, 2004, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., brought HJR 104, “to make eligible for the office of president a person who is not a natural born citizen of the United States but has been a United States citizen for at least 20 years.”

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:H.J.Res104:

 

 

Jan. 4, 2005, Conyers, D-Mich., HJR2, the same as Rohrabacher’s.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:H.J.RES.2:

 

 

 

Feb. 1, 2005, HJR15, Rohrabacher, to require only 20 years citizenship to be eligible for the office of president.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:H.J.Res15:

 

 

April 14, 2005, Snyder, HJR42, requiring 35 years’ citizenship.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:H.J.Res42:

 

 

 

Feb. 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., tried to attach to SB 2678, Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act, an amendment clarifying what “natural-born citizen” includes. Obama and then-Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., were sponsors.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:S2678:

 

 

 

Sen. John McCain’s qualifications as a “natural-born citizen.”

 

 

 

 

References – internet links to documents for determining types of citizenship
http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel_01.htm

 

 

 

 

Law of Nations
§ 213. Inhabitants.

“The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners, who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound to the society by their residence, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside in it; and they are obliged to defend it, because it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the rights of citizens. They enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. The perpetual inhabitants are those who have received the right of perpetual residence. These are a kind of citizens of an inferior order, and are united to the society without participating in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their fathers; and, as the state has given to these the right of perpetual residence, their right passes to their posterity.”

“U.S. national is a person born in or having ties with “an outlying possession of the United States” which is as of 2005, only American Samoa and Swains Island.

Additionally, it also includes those individuals born abroad to two U.S. national parents, or those born abroad to one alien parent and one U.S. national parent. Additionally, there is a residency requirement for the parents of the child prior to birth in order to transmit U.S. nationality. “

Rights and Restrictions

Restrictions
U.S. nationals cannot vote in any election or hold elected office.

Rights
•Allowed to work and reside anywhere in the U.S. without restrictions.
•Eligible to apply for U.S. passport just like U.S. citizens. In fact, there is no difference between the passport for U.S. national and U.S. citizen. Both of them mention the ‘Nationality – USA’.
•Eligible to apply for U.S. citizenship through naturalization under the same rules as other permanent residents.

http://www.immihelp.com/immigration/us-national.html

 

 

 

 

Summary: Throughout U.S. history, various authorities have expressed the viewpoint that birthplace alone determines federal citizenship. Except for Lynch v. Clarke (1844), case law does not support this viewpoint. In Lynch v. Clarke, Vice-Chancellor Sandford ruled that Julia Lynch was a New York State citizen at birth, even though her parents were not citizens at the time of her birth. In his dicta, the Vice-Chancellor expressed his (non-legally-binding) opinion that Miss Lynch, in addition to being a citizen, was also a natural born citizen. The fact that Miss Lynch was deemed to be a natural born citizen according to a State judge’s dicta does not necessarily mean that she was a natural born citizen under the Federal Constitution Cici, Lynch v. Clarke was decided in New York state court. It is not binding in Federal matters.

 

 

Of particular note is that it was cited by Justice Gray in the case of US v. Wong Kim Ark and yet Justice Gray still did not declare Wong Kim Ark to be a “natural born citizen”, but simply a citizen by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment.

 

 

 

Perkins v. Elg is actually a good case to reference. In it, Justice Hughes indicates that both Marie Elg and “young Steinkauler”, both of whom were born on US soil to naturalized US citizen parents, were natural born citizens.

 

 

 

Ankeny v. Gov. Daniels also was a state case and consequently is not binding in Federal court. I would also point out that it was wrongly decided, but that’s another matter.

 

 

 

In 1898, Supreme Court Justice Gray in delivering the majority opinion in the case of US v Wong Kim Ark stated “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, … by authority of Congress, exercised … by declaring certain classes of persons to be citizens, as in the enactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens …” [See: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649] That statement clearly indicates that children of citizens who are born outside US Territory, who gain their citizenship by Congressional statute are naturalized. In other words, simply having citizen parents isn’t enough to make a natural born citizen!

 

 

In 1951, Chief Judge Phillips in delivering the opinion in the case of Zimmer v. Acheson for the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit said of someone who was born outside the United States to two US citizen parents, acquiring their citizenship under Revised Statutes § 1993 (the precursor of todays 8 USC 1401), that the nature of their citizenship “status as a citizen was that of a naturalized citizen and not a native-born citizen.” [See: https://www.courtlistener.com/…/zimmer-v-acheson…/…]

 

 

 

In 1956, Judge Hamley, in delivering the opinion in the case of Wong Kam Wo v. Dulles for the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in a case pertaining to two men born outside the United States to a naturalized US citizen father, noted that Revised Statutes § 1993 (the precursor of todays 8 USC 1401) is “a naturalization law in the constitutional sense.” [See: https://www.courtlistener.com/…/wong-kam-wo-and…/…]

 

 

 

And in 1971, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, who just 4 years earlier had written the majority opinion in the case of Afroyim v. Rusk, had the following observation to make of foreign-born children of US citizens; “Although those Americans who acquire their citizenship under statutes conferring citizenship on the foreign-born children of citizens are not popularly thought of as naturalized citizens, the use of the word “naturalize” in this way has a considerable constitutional history. Congress is empowered by the Constitution to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” Art. I, 8. Anyone acquiring citizenship solely under the exercise of this power is, constitutionally speaking, a naturalized citizen.”

 

 

 

The position of the courts for well over a century is that foreign born children of US citizens who acquire their citizenship wholly through Congressional statutes or by Act of Law are “naturalized” citizens. Not, Natural Born Citizens and not Eligible for the Presidency or Vice Presidency.

Self Preservation Party

A Word Of Caution About Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, And Marco Rubio || Fred Weinberg


I explain why I sincerely think any of those guys would be a bad idea.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/a-word-of-caution-about-ted-cruz-rand-paul-and-marco-rubio/#dYFoPqQpugbQikeD.99

I explain why I sincerely think any of those guys would be a bad idea.

Ted-Cruz-3-SC-1024x641

Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio are flaming stars in the Republican Party right now.

The Tea Party folks want—desperately—for one of them to become the Party’s nominee in 2016.

Any of those guys would be a bad idea.

Not because of their political ideas.  I agree with most of them.

But because—in the parlance of Oklahoma oilmen—none of them have peed a drop.

They are all first term United States Senators.  Just like Barack Hussein Obama was.

And just how has the Presidency worked out for Obama?

These guys say great things.  They know how to use their oratory to sweep crowds up in their enthusiasm. Just like Obama.  Different words.  Different ideas.  But the same methods.

So far, all that proves is that a well-used tongue can get you elected President before you’re ready.

Show me anything in any of those guys’ background that shows they are any more ready than Obama was to become President and that they would do any better job.

They are Senators.

A Senator is basically Bill O’Reilly without an audience, power, and a $20-million a year paycheck.

Historically, they make lousy executives because they spend their days and nights bloviating and fundraising but not doing anything of real substance.  It doesn’t matter whether or not you say the right things.  A self-professed conservative who has no experience or skill is just as dangerous in the White House as a socialist like Obama.

If Ted Cruz really wants to be President, he should go back home to Texas, run for Governor, serve eight years, and then come back and tell us that he now has the experience to be President because he has actually run one of the most populous states in the nation.

The same holds true for Paul and Rubio.

Read More Here: http://www.westernjournalism.com/a-word-of-caution-about-ted-cruz-rand-paul-and-marco-rubio/

Attorney Mario Apuzzo Responds To Fred Thompson’s Article Defending Marco Rubio’s Constitutional Eligibility || By Mario Apuzzo | Courtesy: Devvy KIdd @ Devvy.com


fred_thompson_flag

Fred Thompson has written an article in which he argues that Marco Rubio is eligible to be Vice-President. See it at this link. I have left this comment at his blog:

Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the Office of President.” Did you see that, today only a “natural born Citizen” is eligible to be President. A “citizen of the United States” is not eligible to be President today.

The clear distinction between a “citizen” and a “natural born Citizen” is natural and therefore universal, for a civil society must start with original members (called “citizens” in a republic) who are the creators of that society. Their children, grandchildren, etc. (“Posterity”) then are the “natural-born citizens.” This is what Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 in effect says. The creators of the new republic were “Citizens of the United States” and their “Posterity” (Preamble to the Constitution) were “natural born Citizens.” The Founders and Framers also allowed for new citizens through naturalization. Hence, any naturalized citizen under any Act of Congress becomes a “citizen of the United States,” just like the original “Citizens of the United States.” A reading of the plain text of the Fourteenth Amendment shows that it also only adds to the “citizens of the United States,” simply by persons being born (without requiring “citizen” parents) or naturalized in its jurisdiction. And the children (“Posterity”) born in the United States to those new first generation “citizens of the United States” then become “natural born Citizens,” just like the children of the descendents of the original “Citizens of the United States.”

Minor defined a “natural-born citizen” under the “common-law” with which the Framers were familiar. The definition it gave is a child born in a country to parents who were “citizens” of that country at the time the child was born. Some argue that this definition is not dispositive, because the Court did not say that a child born in the United States to alien parents is not a “natural-born citizen.” This argument is frivolous, for we need to understand what the Court intended by what it said, and not by what it did not say. If I want to define a dog, I include as many of a dog’s attributes, including that a dog by nature is an animal with warm blood. I do not also have to say at the same time that by nature a dog is not an animal with cold blood. There is no indication that this definition is not totally inclusive and exclusive. On the contrary, this has always been the definition of the clause. This definition has never changed.

Read More Here: Attorney Mario Apuzzo Responds To Fred Thompson’s Article Defending Marco Rubio’s Constitutional Eligibility

Related Stories From Devvy Kidd @ Devvy.com

Ted Cruz is no Larry McDonald

Part II

Part III

Neither Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio are eligible to run for president – just like the impostor in the White House. Ted Cruz is 43. He renounced his Canadian citizenship. Doesn’t matter. The Constitution says natural born at birth, not natural born at birth at age 43. Rubio’s parents did not become citizens until after Rubio was born.

Senator Ted Cruz Is Not a “Natural Born Citizen” and Therefore Not Eligible to Be President

Attorney Mario Apuzzo Responds To Fred Thompson’s Article Defending Marco Rubio’s Constitutional Eligibility

The same applies to Bobby Jindal. His parents came to the US six months before Jindal was born. They could not have become citizens in six months.

“Piyush Jindal was born in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to Amar and Raj Jindal, immigrants from Punjab, India, who came to the U.S. six months before he was born.”

There was a reason the founders grand fathered in that clause – Barry Soetoro aka Obama is a perfect example.

‘The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law’ as U.S. Federal Common Law Not English Common Law Define What an Article II Natural Born Citizen Is

Cruz and Rubio are nothing but Band Aid pushers:

 

TED CRUZ IS NO LARRY MCDONALD PART 1 || By Kelleigh Nelson | Courtesy: Devvy Kidd @Devvy.com


Kelleigh_Nelson_com_hdr

By Kelleigh Nelson
February 1, 2014
NewsWithViews.com

 

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.” Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, allegedly killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was allegedly shot down by the Soviets

 

“We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.” -Representative Larry McDonald

 

“It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged.” -G. K. Chesterton

 

Representative Larry McDonald was born April 1, 1935 in Atlanta, Georgia and supposedly died September 1, 1983 in the Sea of Japan. He was aboard Korean Airlines Flight 007. McDonald was invited to South Korea to attend a celebration of the 30th anniversary of the United States–South Korea Mutual Defense Treaty with fellow members of Congress, Senator Jesse Helms of North Carolina, Senator Steve Symms of Idaho, and Representative Carroll Hubbard of Kentucky. Because of delays, the other three did not take the same flight as McDonald. A Soviet MiG-23 Flogger and three Soviet Su-15 Flagon fighters intercepted and allegedly shot down the plane over Sakhalin Island in the Sea of Japan. There were 268 others allegedly lost at sea.

 

It is my belief, along with many others, that the plane was forced to land on Soviet soil, and those who survived, including, and especially, McDonald, became Soviet prisoners. [Link]

Read More Here: Part I http://www.newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh199.htm

Read More Here:   Part II   &  Part III