Natural Born Citizen -vs- Naturalized Citizen. Why It Matters.


4a2b5afc0a2af7e2710f386230f00f00

My Name is Bakht Awar Ahmadi an Afghani Patriot…I’m a very devout Muslim.

I am married to an Native born American woman who converted to Islam shortly after our marriage in order to please me…Allah has blessed us with two wonderful sons who are taught only in the ways of Islam.

 

We have raised our two sons, Ahmed Ibrahim and Abdul Shahid in the Mideast for 30 years and I could not be any more prouder of my sons than I am today, as they have both become very devout followers of Allah, their desires to please Muhammad will make it absolutely impossible for them to be loyal or to assimilate into any other culture than Islam, or, to serve anyone but Allah. Their loyalties are to Allah, Muhammad, and the Koran only…

 

My family, Catherine Mosley Ahmadi, and our two sons who are [naturalized American citizens] through their mothers American citizenship moved to America when they were 28 and 30 years of age, and are still waiting to be Naturalized myself…

 

Both our sons are frequently traveling back and forth to their homeland for both business and pleasure, and continue today to make their yearly pilgrimage to Mecca to pay homage to Allah and Muhammad which is an important part of our culture.

 

By design and conditioning….both our sons have become active in American politics. Abdul today is an elected Representative for Chicago’s District 7 and has become very well liked in his district, he is also considered an energetic and charismatic activist for the civil rights movement, he is both an outstanding leader and role model for our young Black and Arab inner city kids and has made great progress working closely with our dear friend Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam and CAIR to bring America’s mistreatment of Muslim’s into the spotlight and for lowering the crime in his district.

 

20 years after first arriving in the United States at the age of 48, our youngest son Abdul Shahid Abmadi desires to run for the Presidency as a faithful Democrat so that he can make the necessary changes he believes will better the treatment of Muslims across this nation, especially after witnessing our country being destroyed by American intervention for 14 years of his life, and renounces his Afghani citizenship in order to meet all the requirements the Democrats, Republicans and the American people have redefined to suit those just like himself who were born outside of the United States…

 

Abdul Shahid Ahmadi was born to ONE American PARENT and is a Naturalized American Citizen, and even though he was born and lived in Afghanistan for 28 years of his life, he is made eligible thanks to those who were so supportive of Barack Obama and Rafael Cruz, and, his having lived in the United States for the required 14 years and his being 48 years of age, well above the 35 years of age that is required makes him eligible for the Presidency….

 

According to the Rafael Cruz and Obama supporters, Abdul Shahid has met all the requirements to run for the Presidency of the United States of America.

 

Abdul Shahid quickly becomes a champion leader and a very popular 2 term Representative of the Democrat Party in the District 7 area of Chicago and the surrounding areas for his outspokenness against the hate speech aimed at Muslims and has a huge following amongst both the Arab Muslim and Black community’s, he also counts the many White Liberals in the Democrat party as his most loyal supporters…

 

The Democrats wanting to vote in the First ever American Afghani Muslim have an electorate turnout of 48% in the 2032 general election and the voting fraud is of a massive scale, which overwhelms the conservative Candidate.

 

Abdul Shahid Ahmadi ultimately wins the 2032 elections by a landslide to become the 48th President of the United States of America and, the very first American Afghani Muslim President ever to hold our highest office………….

 

Any fool that thinks this is what our Framers intended needn’t vote, you have no business whatsoever at a ballot box. You are the problem we face today, you are a very real threat to the continued existence and safety of this Nation and Republic and a very real danger to the American people and the future of this country….

 

Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, the Liberal MSM, the Obama, Rafael, Marco and Jindal supporters and the many others who enable these ineligible candidates are all culpable in the destruction and loss of our freedoms and liberties, you are not only encouraging ineligible candidates, but you are enabling them and their ulterior agenda’s or whatever else their underlying causes might be….Which, I would guess aren’t good to began with if they have gone through such great lengths and trouble to hide their records in order to deceive the American people.

 

This may just be a silly made up scenario to many of you Rafael Cruz, Marco Rubio supporters and Obama voters, but with today’s atmosphere of appeasement, toleration and acceptance of Islam coupled with their ignoring our Constitutional Documents to elect first time ever candidates by unconstitutional means. This could be a very real threat to our existence, our freedoms and national security’s, and it doesn’t have to be a Muslim President, it could be any number of foreign radicals that wish an end to the evil powers of the United States of America…

 

And you’re enabling them…And there is absolutely no excuse for your actions, whether you’re well informed or not.
No excuses, None Whatsoever.

 

Many conservatives who spent the better part of 5 years attempting to prove that the current U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama -aka- Barry Soetoro is not a natural born citizen prior to Rafael’s Cruz’s and Marco Rubio’s announcements to run, have also applauded their actions as jr Senators and are embracing their ineligible candidacy’s…

 

What will your actions be when Abdul Shahid Ahmadi decides to run and is then elected…What will you say then. I’m So Sorry?

 

Blood makes you Family, Territory makes you Loyal…

 

Blood & Soil, Descent & Territory = Natural Born.

 

One Must Be Born of the Country To Two Parents who are Both American Citizens in order to Meet the Requirements of Eligibility…

 

Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal and Barack Hussein Obama are not Natural Born Citizens.

 

They are Naturalized Citizens….

 

He’s ineligible….Period. Mark Levin and others are Horribly Mistaken here, or, they are purposefully enabling yet another Ineligible Presidential Candidate in their support for Rafael Cruz…

 

Anyone who is made a Citizen through an Act of Law is Naturalized…Not Natural Born….

 

People are mistaking or are refusing to differentiate “Born a Citizen” from “Natural Born.”

 

All Natural Born Natives are Citizens at Birth….
But not all Citizens at Birth are Natural Born…

 

Anyone who is made a Citizen through an ACT of Law is a Naturalized Citizen and is not eligible for the Presidency.

 

One must be born upon American Soil to TWO Parents who are BOTH AMERICAN CITIZENS…

 

Rafael Cruz, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal nor had Obama met any of these Requirements, and they never will.

 

Marcus Tullius Cicero

Marcus Tullius Cicero

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

Trey Gowdy, Betrays the Constitution to Support Marco Rubio’s Ineligibility, As are many other Americans


And another Champion of the People and Constitution bites the Dust,,,,There is no candidate who is more clearly defined as Ineligible than Marco Rubio, and Trey Gowdy knows it…

4a2b5afc0a2af7e2710f386230f00f00

Neither Marco Rubio nor Bobby Jindals parents were American Citizens at the time of their births….I am so tired of seeing our Constitution Battered and Neglected in this Manner, if our Constitution is destroyed, than so will all our other Protections be destroyed…

All of our Protections people, including our precious and very fragile freedoms along with it.

Add in the Ineligible Ted Cruz and we have the makings for future Foreign Presidents….Don’t think so, than your a blind fool, that or terribly misinformed or outright compliant to our Nations destruction.

Why, for what other reason would any of you want to make allowances for Marco Rubio and those like himself except for your enabling them to further destroy this Nation and mind you, all of you….The Constitution of  The United States of America was not set up, structured, constructed and sealed AROUND each and every AMERICAN to protect THEM only, but to also protect this NATION from our enemies and from especially outside INFLUENCES that might destroy us from WITHIN, thus meaning FOREIGN Intrusions into our highest offices of the Presidency and Vice Presidency, our House and Senate which are all protected by these very FRAGILE PIECES of FOUNDING DOCUMENTS….

You and I, the American People, PATRIOTS all, are the Backbone of our CONSTITUTION  and we are seriously BROKEN…

Can you understand what “WE ARE BROKEN” means to us?

That Americans are the ones making these allowances, We the People, America’s Patriot’s are, and many others will soon follow our lead…Have they not already followed Barack Obama’s?

Once these allowances are made for those who are ineligible, no one will ever be able to challenge them again and that will have very serious and unprecedented consequences upon each and everyone of us as Americans and our Nation and especially our future generations, what we allow now will in fact impact their lives dramatically.

And we can stop the wrongful usurpation of this Nation today, its so insanely easy, simply don’t support them, don’t vote for them, let them know the reason you aren’t voting for or supporting them is because they do not meet our Framers requirements for the Presidency and make it known LOUD and clear so that other INELIGIBLE CANDIDATES know that as  her first and last Defenders American Patriots will not tolerate nor support their INELIGIBILITY.

CLOSE THIS DOOR and SEAL IT CLOSED TODAY, RIGHT NOW…!!!!

Close it now before this goes any further or mark my words, not only will you be culpable to your own destruction, but also the destruction of your family’s, your neighbors and this Nation’s security, as well as our future generations of Americans.

Has not Obama or his actions given any of you, any of you, a clear enough understanding or insight into what would follow after him if we continued to make allowances for ineligible candidates, redefining the requirements our Framers set in stone for our future Presidents eligibility?

Obama’s INELIGIBILITY has ENCOURAGE others with the same status to run for our highest office because they too think they can get away with it, and thus far, they have, and our corrupted do nothing traitorous Congress has cleared the path for him and that alone should concern all of you,  why would they enable Obama, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio to circumvent CONSTITUTIONAL LAW?

Why aren’t you Americans asking yourself that, or do you even care any more?

Where in our History has so many questionable Candidates ran for office, and at what time in our history has so many Ineligible candidates ran for our highest offices and don’t you for a moment suspect that something is amiss, that this comes right after Obama’s Illegal Presidency?

This is being Encouraged and you Americans, many of you God fearing Patriots are Allowing it by supporting them….

STOP IT, for the love of this Nation, STOP & THINK…Please research this for yourself.

If we continue to allow this, It won’t be long until we have Foreign President’s ruling over our children making law…THAT”S RIGHT, MAKING LAW, and don’t any of you dare tell me that will never happen when we have an Ineligible President now who is occupying our White House already, and he is MAKING LAWS that are aimed against AMERICANS and are favoring our Enemies….,don’t you even dare…

AND THAT MY DEAR PRECIOUS FRIENDS, are what they want, people who can work outside of our Constitution, the very same Constitution that many of you have professed you would die to protect, the very same document that many have already made the ultimate sacrifice for and the very same DOCUMENT you are now helping to destroy by allowing these Unconstitutional Exceptions into our highest offices….WHY??

NO ONE, not the President, not Congress, not the Senate nor Supreme Courts or States can change any of the wording within our Constitution to make them mean anything less than what our Founders interpreted them to mean….No Person or Persons have the Power to Do That.

So I have to ask, why are you trying to?

Am I to understand now that our Constitution is meaningless any more… Is that what you Patriots are Saying today?

Because that’s exactly what I am hearing and reading everywhere I go by the Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio supporters, as well as Bobby Jindals supporters before he stepped down, and if it doesn’t matter to you, then that breaks my heart…

Because, how can any of you who are supporting these Ineligible Candidates turn right around and honor and celebrate this Nation, our Constitution, Her Heroes and Veterans who sacrificed so much to protect this Nation and our Constitution with their lives, when you are now culpable in its very destruction…..

And, your doing it with a STRAIGHT FACE?

Blood & Soil, Descent & Territory = Natural Born

Anyone who is made a Citizen through an Act of Law is Naturalized…Not Natural Born.

People are mistaking Citizens at Birth with Natural Born, nor will they differentiate Citizen at Birth from Natural Born….

All Natural Born Natives are Citizens at Birth….
However, not all Citizens at Birth are Natural Born…

Anyone who is made a Citizen through an ACT of Law is a Naturalized Citizen and is not eligible for the Presidency.

A Natural Born Citizen would not have to renounce another Citizenship….Ted Cruz has.

One must be born upon American Soil to TWO Parents who are BOTH AMERICAN CITIZENS…To Meet The Natural Born Requirements to become eligible for the Presidency…

Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jindal nor had Obama met any of these Requirements for the Presidency, and they never will.

That Is A Fact, You Cannot Change Constitutional Law.

What we are seeing today with Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio as was the case of Barack OBAMA… IS,,,,The Willful Subversion of America’s Founding Document’s, By Both Sides of the Isle, and many of you are playing right into their hands!

Read Here: Trey Gowdy Twists Natural Born Citizen Qualification to Support Marco Rubio

http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/12/trey-gowdy-twists-natural-born-citizen-qualification-to-support-marco-rubio/

Sources:

Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defines a Natural Born Citizen in1789 In defining an [Article II “natural born Citizen]…

http://www.scribd.com/…/Founder-and-Historian-David...

 

Defining Natural-Born Citizen by P.A. Madison on November 18th, 2008

http://www.federalistblog.us/…/natural-born_citizen…/

 

 

http://www.federalistblog.us/…/natural-born_citizen_defined/

 

Source: Attorney Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

March 13, 2015 http://puzo1.blogspot.com

 

 

Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defined Natural Born Citizenship in 1789 – by Atty Mario Apuzzo

http://www.scribd.com/…/Founder-and-Historian-David-Ramsay-…

 

A Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What & For How Long?

https://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/a-congressi…/

 

The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/natural-born-citizen-clause-req…

 

Senator Ted Cruz Is Not a “Natural Born Citizen” and Therefore Not Eligible to Be President

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/senator-ted-cruz-is-not-natural…

 

The Fallacies of Congressional Legislative Attorney Jack Maskell’s Definition of a “Natural Born Citizen”

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/the-fallacies-of-congressional.…

 

Birthright Citizenship in the United States: A Global Comparison

http://www.cis.org/birthright-...

 

See: Publius Huldah’s important article on this subject…http://newswithviews.com/Publius/huldah110.htm

 

 

Defining Natural-Born Citizen: The Debate Over Who Qualifies To Run For President…http://ivn.us/2013/08/13/defining-natural-born-citizen/

 

 

Truth, the Whole Truth, & Nothing but the Truth – Cruz Control…

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2015/03/25/truth-the-whole-truth-nothing-but-the-truth-cruz-control/

 

 

Cruz Control – Part II

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2015/03/27/cruz-control-part-ii/

 

 

Obama never certified by Hawaii Democratic Party

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/obama-never-certified-by-hawaii-democratic-party/

 

Absolute Proof the Founders Knew and Accepted Vattel`s French “naturels” to mean “natural born” in English Before Constitution Was Written…

https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

 

Trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “natural born Citizens (NBC)” are “Citizens at birth (CAB)” but not all “CAB” are “NBC”!

https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab-are-nbc/

 

John Jay’s letter to George Washington dated 25 Jul 1787:

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/is-being-born-citizen-of...

ny_1789_jay

1775 Benjamin Franklin Wrote Vatel

A Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What & For How Long?

https://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/a-congressional-natural-born-citizen-parts-i-ii-iii/

 

CVJ5dUOUAAAWQt4.jpg large

 

Presidential Eligibility Tutorial

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

 

 

7 FAM 1131.6-3 …Not Citizens by “Naturalization”

(CT:CON-474; 08-19-2013) http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf

 

US Constitution

 

Cruz, Obama, Rubio nor Jindal meet any of these requirements…

 

Excellent article: Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/07/natural-born-citizen-matter-republicans-democrats/#3eTYHl4oG1Fsxbmj.99

 

Constitutional Qualifications  House of Representatives

4 Supreme Court Cases define “natural born citizen” | The Post & Email

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/

 

Vatel Eligibilty Natural Born

4 SUPREME COURT CASES DEFINE ‘NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'(Updated May 25, 2012) http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1308252582

 

 

 1790 Nationality Act repealed by the 1795 Immigration act

Check out sections 3 (correction of definition) -and- 4 (repeal of 1790 act).

http://www.indiana.edu/~kdhist/H105-documents-web/week08/naturalization1790.html

 

 

June 11, 2003, Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Ark., brought HJR 59. It was intended to “permit persons who are not natural born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 35 years, to be eligible to hold the offices of president and vice president.”

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:H.J.Res59:

 

 

Sept. 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., brought HJR67, which would have done the same as Snyder’s, only the requirement to be a citizen was lowered to 20 years.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:H.J.Res67:

 

 

Feb. 25, 2004, Sen. Don Nickles, R-Okla., brought S.B. 2128 to “try to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural born citizen requirement.” But it defined NBC as someone who was born in and is subject to the United States,” which was not the understanding of the framers of the Constitution.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:S2128:

 

 

Sept. 15, 2004, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., brought HJR 104, “to make eligible for the office of president a person who is not a natural born citizen of the United States but has been a United States citizen for at least 20 years.”

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:H.J.Res104:

 

 

Jan. 4, 2005, Conyers, D-Mich., HJR2, the same as Rohrabacher’s.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:H.J.RES.2:

 

 

 

Feb. 1, 2005, HJR15, Rohrabacher, to require only 20 years citizenship to be eligible for the office of president.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:H.J.Res15:

 

 

April 14, 2005, Snyder, HJR42, requiring 35 years’ citizenship.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:H.J.Res42:

 

 

 

Feb. 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., tried to attach to SB 2678, Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act, an amendment clarifying what “natural-born citizen” includes. Obama and then-Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., were sponsors.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:S2678:

 

 

 

Sen. John McCain’s qualifications as a “natural-born citizen.”

 

 

 

 

References – internet links to documents for determining types of citizenship
http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel_01.htm

 

 

 

 

Law of Nations
§ 213. Inhabitants.

“The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners, who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound to the society by their residence, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside in it; and they are obliged to defend it, because it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the rights of citizens. They enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. The perpetual inhabitants are those who have received the right of perpetual residence. These are a kind of citizens of an inferior order, and are united to the society without participating in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their fathers; and, as the state has given to these the right of perpetual residence, their right passes to their posterity.”

“U.S. national is a person born in or having ties with “an outlying possession of the United States” which is as of 2005, only American Samoa and Swains Island.

Additionally, it also includes those individuals born abroad to two U.S. national parents, or those born abroad to one alien parent and one U.S. national parent. Additionally, there is a residency requirement for the parents of the child prior to birth in order to transmit U.S. nationality. “

Rights and Restrictions

Restrictions
U.S. nationals cannot vote in any election or hold elected office.

Rights
•Allowed to work and reside anywhere in the U.S. without restrictions.
•Eligible to apply for U.S. passport just like U.S. citizens. In fact, there is no difference between the passport for U.S. national and U.S. citizen. Both of them mention the ‘Nationality – USA’.
•Eligible to apply for U.S. citizenship through naturalization under the same rules as other permanent residents.

http://www.immihelp.com/immigration/us-national.html

 

 

 

 

Summary: Throughout U.S. history, various authorities have expressed the viewpoint that birthplace alone determines federal citizenship. Except for Lynch v. Clarke (1844), case law does not support this viewpoint. In Lynch v. Clarke, Vice-Chancellor Sandford ruled that Julia Lynch was a New York State citizen at birth, even though her parents were not citizens at the time of her birth. In his dicta, the Vice-Chancellor expressed his (non-legally-binding) opinion that Miss Lynch, in addition to being a citizen, was also a natural born citizen. The fact that Miss Lynch was deemed to be a natural born citizen according to a State judge’s dicta does not necessarily mean that she was a natural born citizen under the Federal Constitution Cici, Lynch v. Clarke was decided in New York state court. It is not binding in Federal matters.

 

 

Of particular note is that it was cited by Justice Gray in the case of US v. Wong Kim Ark and yet Justice Gray still did not declare Wong Kim Ark to be a “natural born citizen”, but simply a citizen by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment.

 

 

 

Perkins v. Elg is actually a good case to reference. In it, Justice Hughes indicates that both Marie Elg and “young Steinkauler”, both of whom were born on US soil to naturalized US citizen parents, were natural born citizens.

 

 

 

Ankeny v. Gov. Daniels also was a state case and consequently is not binding in Federal court. I would also point out that it was wrongly decided, but that’s another matter.

 

 

 

In 1898, Supreme Court Justice Gray in delivering the majority opinion in the case of US v Wong Kim Ark stated “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, … by authority of Congress, exercised … by declaring certain classes of persons to be citizens, as in the enactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens …” [See: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649] That statement clearly indicates that children of citizens who are born outside US Territory, who gain their citizenship by Congressional statute are naturalized. In other words, simply having citizen parents isn’t enough to make a natural born citizen!

 

 

In 1951, Chief Judge Phillips in delivering the opinion in the case of Zimmer v. Acheson for the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit said of someone who was born outside the United States to two US citizen parents, acquiring their citizenship under Revised Statutes § 1993 (the precursor of todays 8 USC 1401), that the nature of their citizenship “status as a citizen was that of a naturalized citizen and not a native-born citizen.” [See: https://www.courtlistener.com/…/zimmer-v-acheson…/…]

 

 

 

In 1956, Judge Hamley, in delivering the opinion in the case of Wong Kam Wo v. Dulles for the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in a case pertaining to two men born outside the United States to a naturalized US citizen father, noted that Revised Statutes § 1993 (the precursor of todays 8 USC 1401) is “a naturalization law in the constitutional sense.” [See: https://www.courtlistener.com/…/wong-kam-wo-and…/…]

 

 

 

And in 1971, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, who just 4 years earlier had written the majority opinion in the case of Afroyim v. Rusk, had the following observation to make of foreign-born children of US citizens; “Although those Americans who acquire their citizenship under statutes conferring citizenship on the foreign-born children of citizens are not popularly thought of as naturalized citizens, the use of the word “naturalize” in this way has a considerable constitutional history. Congress is empowered by the Constitution to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” Art. I, 8. Anyone acquiring citizenship solely under the exercise of this power is, constitutionally speaking, a naturalized citizen.”

 

 

 

The position of the courts for well over a century is that foreign born children of US citizens who acquire their citizenship wholly through Congressional statutes or by Act of Law are “naturalized” citizens. Not, Natural Born Citizens and not Eligible for the Presidency or Vice Presidency.

Self Preservation Party

Marine Who is Being Held in Mexico Over Gun Charges Will Get a New Hearing Next Week || by Dan Cannon


Marine Who is Being Held in Mexico Over Gun Charges Will Get a New Hearing Next Week

ant-640x355

Marine Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi has been in Mexican custody since the beginning of April after the Marine allegedly attempted to enter Mexico with firearms in his car.

Tahmooressi says he failed to notice the signs leading up to the border and accidentally missed the final turn to stay on US soil.

According to the LA Times,

Benghazi: The Cover-up of the Cover-up Obama and Clinton Lied, Americans Died || By Mark Alexander | COURTESY: William J. Max MILINET


MILINET

“It is of great importance to set a resolution, not to be shaken, never to tell an untruth. There is no vice so mean, so pitiful, so contemptible; and he who permits himself to tell a lie once, finds it much easier to do it a second and a third time, till at length it becomes habitual; he tells lies without attending to it, and truths without the world’s believing him. This falsehood of the tongue leads to that of the heart, and in time depraves all its good disposition.” –Thomas Jefferson (1785)

2014-04-30-5efc6613_large
Read More Here;
http://patriotpost.us/alexander/25317

Following Images Added by Jericho777
1380478_582551965114514_733907927_n

309984_522618597774518_63861723_n
Do you Liberals really want this woman as your President?

Of  Course You Do!~

What’s Wrong with the Right || By Guest Column Pamela Geller


Image Added by Jericho777
art106_a

National Review Online took another gratuitous shot at me Thursday in an article defending Ayaan Hirsi Ali, saying: “Hirsi Ali is no Pamela Geller. On the contrary, for her whole life, Hirsi Ali has used anger as a catalyst to great good.” Is it necessary to smear me in order to defend Hirsi Ali? And this is not the first time that NRO has allowed insults and defamation against me and other freedom fighters to run unedited. I hardly know why. But I do know that NRO has no guts, no spine, and no conviction.

What’s more, Hirsi Ali has said things about Islam that I have never said, yet somehow she is acceptable and I am not. How does Rogan intellectually wrestle with the irreconcilable? His premise is completely and utterly false; on what does he make these ugly assertions?

Read More Here;   What’s Wrong with the Right