Sorry about the X-rated content. If you don’t want to be disturbed, by thoroughly disgusting and unimaginably vile content regarding child abuse in Islam, I recommend you move to another topic now. Otherwise, please start with this video.
I recommend you download the video as YouTube has been known to remove and ban truth, even when spoken by Muslims themselves, simply because Muslims complain about it.
In the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfBHEy76W6c an Imam recounts a visit by Khomeini to Iraq, and talks about Khomeini suggesting they stay at an Iraqi host’s house in the city of Utaifiyyah, in which Khomeini pressed a 4-5 year old girl into a temporary “marriage” or “Misyar”. He then sexually violated and sodomized the little girl “all night” “from the front as well as from the back even while she screams and cries”.
After having earlier referred to the little girl as “beautiful”, the imam delivering the account feigns disgust regarding Khomeini’s treatment of the little girl, but then declares “How could he have a temporary marriage with this little girl, when more grown up girls were around in the house. He could have had a temporary marriage with one of them.”
He thus seemed to indicate that he didn’t see anything wrong, except that the girl could have been a little older, and he must necessarily agree that 9 years is old enough, because that was how old Aisha was when Muhammad was doing her.
The video also offers valuable insight into the power of Imams trumping the common sense, reason, conscience and surviving shreds of humanity, if any, of their subordinates that are in bondage to Satan.
Q “What do you think about temporary marriage to a little child?”
A “Sayyid, my answer is your answer. Your action is the right one, you are the imam. You can make the verdict. It is not possible for somebody like me to differ from your opinion.”
It’s easy to see the purely reprobate nature of the monsters involved, particularly since rescuing the little girl when he heard her “screams and cries” “all night”, would seem to have not even occurred to this reprobate coward, or at least he certainly took no action to rescue the girl. Yet the little girl was obviously scarred for life as a result of the rape. How many more are there like her, since it takes the testimony of 4 men to bring a conviction of rape, against a Muslim. Particularly since the victim of rape is perceived as having dishonored her family, so it sometimes ends in her murder by the hand of her own father.
It’s all because Muhammad set the standard for sex with children in Islam, having married Aisha when she was 6 and consummating that marriage when she was just a 9 year old child, and he was a 53 year old. No honest Muslim will deny their prophets urges and desires in this regard, as his self-serving alter-ego “Allah” lavished on him all the wives he wanted – but only for him.
Prior to Muhammad’s stand-alone “religion” sex with children likely wasn’t an acceptable practice among Arabs, any more than it was any other culture then, or today.
Even the Hadith suggests this “When Abu Bakr came, Khawlah repeated what she had said. He replied, “She is [like] his brother’s daughter. Would she be appropriate for him?”
While I had seen this debate video some time ago, I thought it was an aberration. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht0eJaXc2Is However yesterday a YouTuber brought up the subject and I was made to realize that this practice isn’t obscure at all, and I did a search and found the opening video above that discusses this in the context of “temporary marriages” in Islam – that is, fornication and adultery masked by a false facade of “marriage”.
While we certainly wouldn’t want anyone to judge the Gospel of the perfect and sinless Messiah, by the vast majority of folks that have deceived themselves into believing they are Christians, the behavior of the Islamic self-proclaimed “prophet” Muhammad is the very best way to judge Islam. Judging the behavior of the fruit of Islam is fair game as well.
According to some Muslims, sex with 1 day, week, or year old infants, is permissible and is accomplished by “thighing”.
Khomeini on sex with children and the rules on injured children. “If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life.” “But this girl will not count as one of the man’s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl’s sister.”
A Muslim on sex allowed by “Allah” with a 1 year old girl.
There is no plausible deniability since those are Muslims – even imams – in those YouTubes discussing rape and mufa’khathat of children. However fundamental Muslims may not consider it rape since the father of the 4-5 year old girl “gave” her to Khomeini to abuse, like “Allah” “gave” to Muhammad 6 year old Aisha, sex slaves captured as “spoils of war”, and “Allah” also “gave” him 1/5 of all the property he and his boys stole from others.
“Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwahs (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shemary, the question forwarded to the committee by the grand scholar of the committee with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421 (Islamic calendar). The inquirer asked the following:
It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufa’khathat of the children (mufa’khathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs” which means placing the male member between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayer of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers – may Allah be please with her.
After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply:
It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kufar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the prophet, peace and prayer of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age. That is why [the prophet] peace and prayer of Allah be upon him placed his male [member] between her thighs and massaged it softly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his [male] member not like other believers.“
Isn’t that just like Islamic leaders? They blame western culture (and I for one have never heard of, nor could have even imagined this despicable horror before), for this – what they admit is a “wide spread” custom among Muslims – even though they later admit that their own “prophet” engaged in the behavior! Even crediting Muhammad’s super-human “member” as his excuse!
That’s akin to when they blame the Israeli Jews, for Islamic rape, murder, mayhem and misery, perpetrated all around the world. With 2 million killed in the Sudan alone!
Some claim there is no hadith making this practice lawful, but are there any Hadith making it unlawful? How did the term “mufa’khathat” come to be? From a Hollywood movie? Are there statutes on the books in Islamic countries outlawing this “widespread” practice? If so, how many men have ever been arrested for it? Does it require 4 witnesses to bring charges against the perpetrator as in the case of rape?
Some excuse Muhammad by claiming this practice is unlawful for followers, as the first paragraph above suggests, but that certainly wouldn’t be the only thing that was lawful for Muhammad but unlawful for his followers – like having more than 4 wives, or getting more than one’s proportionate share of looted “booty”. If this practice does not have roots in Muhammadanism then how did it come to “become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings”?
The fact that a committee had to “study the issue” in the first place, and a religious decree had to be issued in order for Muslims to know whether the practice of thighing children or even infants is right or wrong, tells us everything we need to know about what Muhammadanism does to the minds of Muhammad’s followers.
After reading “has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings” it occurred to me to revisit this video. I believed the reports that the children weren’t actually getting married, but in light of this practice it tends to get one shuddering about what might have gone on after night fell.
While looking for it I found this one where couples are paid $500 to get married. I wonder how much of that $500 “brides” like the one at the end of the video got to spend?
A YouTube gal on temporary marriage – for an hour – in Sunni and Shia.
Divorcing a pre-pubescent wife, as well as thighing of Aisha by Muhammad, and thighing by Muslims allowed, straight from the Hadith in Islamic websites.
Muhammad’s child bride standard is copied by his devoted followers in the world today.
The above poor little child is still playing peek-a-boo!
Muslims are stuck believing that Muhammad’s alter-ego “Allah” “gave” his child bride Aisha to him, just as they are stuck having to believe “Allah” “gave” Muhammad and his boys sex slaves as “spoils of war – booty”, just as they must believe in Muhammad’s unwitnessed account of having ridden on a flying donkey-mule one night.
Again, sorry for the X-rated content, but I thought this information important enough to add to the long list of Muhammad’s reprobate behavior, that his followers – that still have consciences – should see in regard to the license their “prophet” gave their brethren. When will they finally be convicted by having to constantly excuse away the conspicuously reprobate behavior of the “prophet” of Islam, who WAS AS MUCH THE OPPOSITE of the sinless Messiah, as his “religious” invention is the EXACT OPPOSITE of the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel?
If Christians and Jews don’t become engaged in this epic battle, we will only have ourselves to blame, for the bleak future prospects we leave behind for our children.
Even atheists and agnostics (who Muslims kill out of hand rather than allowing them to live in dhimmitude), can become engaged in the battle through a purely secular standpoint, by focusing on the history of Mecca and origins of Islam and it’s rituals.
If you do not become engaged it will be your children and/or grandchildren, that will be compelled to prostrate themselves to the Quraish pagan’s black stone idol in Mecca and pray in the vain repetitions of the heathen, 5 times a day.
For Christians the scriptures not only define the enemy, but also describe the armament we are to use, to engage it. As is made so clear through all of the evil of Islam explored in this forum…
Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places]. 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:
There are tracts for Muslims on the last four websites listed at the bottom of this post. Why not leave one laying around where one of Muhammad’s followers might find it? Particularly from the more Muslim friendly http://www.islamandthetruth.com website.
There are also instructions for making your own.