There is no such thing as a Moderate Muslim, only Apostate ones, and there is no peace in the Religion of Islam, only a cult of death and ruination….
Both the Active Muslims and the Apostate Muslims are Dangerous in that the Apostate Muslim can rise up at any time and moment without warning and kill you and we cannot screen them. We cannot know their hearts, there are no blood test or series of x-rays nor questionnaires that can tell us when a dormant Muslim might rise up against us or which ones are dangerous to us….
So…The safest, surest, and, the most responsible steps would to be to treat them both as dangerous and life threatening…
I’ve recently seen a meme of a bowl of m&ms circulating the net that asked would you eat any of these if you knew that just one of them were poisonous, pretty straight forward question, but what a very powerful message…
We have family’s to consider and can ill afford to take chances with their lives, we had better stop this practice of surrendering ourselves to our sensitivities and start acting on our rights to Self Preservation, because we are at war with Islam and despite what you are told, there is no such thing as a MODERATE nor Peaceful Islam…
Devout Muslims and Apostate Muslims present themselves in exactly the same manner, they both profess to be Muslims, they both claim to read from the same Koran and they both claim the other hijacked the others faith…
They’re either Muslims who are Practicing Quranic Law or, they’re Apostate Muslims.
And then there is the old tired argument that if they’re Apostates, then they’re not truly Muslims, but the problem with that is, that they are presenting themselves as MUSLIMS…
They are PLACING themselves under the INFLUENCE of the Koran and Islam and that makes them very very dangerous in that we cannot see or know what the underlining affects their teachings are having on them, nor can we know who is and isn’t a danger to us…
Which is synonymous to the bowl of m&ms I mentioned, how are we ever suppose to tell the difference and can we trust the Apostate Muslims won’t rise up later against us?
If you are a Muslim that Practices Quranic, Sharia Law, than you are Devout Muslim. You’re Not a Radical nor have you Radicalized Islam, and you certainly didn’t Hijack the Islamic Faith, You Are in fact a DEVOUT Muslim to your Quran and a loyal follower of your prophet Muhammad.
You are according to your Koran a Good Muslim, you are following the precepts and teachings that Muhammad had written down for you to die and kill for…
If You are a Muslim that does not adhere to Quranic Law than you’re an Apostate and many are irresponsibly and dangerously labeling them as MODERATES, of which, they are not. Matter of fact, they are even more dangerous because their actions are the most hidden.
Being either a Devout Muslim or an Apostate is in the same manner that one is either a Devout Christian or an Apostate.
You are either Practicing the precepts of your Faith or you’re ignoring them…..One Or the Other, but not Both.
These Devout Muslims who are killing and destroying everything and one in sight who doesn’t submit to their Quranic teachings are in fact PRACTICING MUSLIMS, they are DEVOUT Followers of QURANIC LAW as was intended by Muhammad for them to be, they are the Good Muslims….or simply put, they were then, as they are today, to be put to death immediately so that other followers not fall into their APOSTASY.
And…, this is the very reason they are spreading throughout the world today, to subvert, to subjugate and force non Muslims to submit to Sharia, and they are wrecking havoc on every Nation they migrate to and once their populations hits the 5% mark in their host country’s, then they become active cells.
Once their Populations hit 5% in their Host Country’s they begin to exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims.
They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply (United States ).
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world:
Folks, there are no MODERATES in any religion or Faith, you ARE…,either Adhering to your faith, or, you’re NOT.
And the media and the Islamic appeasers today are making excuses for them by also being deceitful about who they truly are.
Cancer has either Active or Dormant Cells.
Islam acts in exactly the same manner that these life threatening Cancer cells act, you have one that is an active cell and another that is lying dormant, they are both Life Threatening to their Host (Victims).
Make no mistake, BOTH the Active and Dormant Islamic Cells are a Threat to us….
The one and only difference therebetween these two Islamic Cells are, is that one Islamic Cell is actively seeking out to destroy you and your family’s while the other is spreading quietly and lying Dormant and is waiting to destroy you…
Which makes the Dormant Cell that more dangerous, because you simply never know when it might become active and try to kill you…
“Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel.” –- Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’
And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
And I Proudly Profess That I Am A Proud Member Of Both The Self Preservation & Islamophobic Party’s Of America…
ISLAM by Law is Banned and Forbidden within th4e United States…
Donald Trump is right to call for Islams Total Ban…
1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, a.k.a. the McCarran-Walter Act:
(The 1952 INA act to revise the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality; and for other purposes)
H.R. 13342; Pub.L. 414; 182 Stat. 66.82nd Congress; June 27, 1952.
Islam, By Law, Is Prohibited From U.S. Immigration
8 U.S. Code § 1182 – Inadmissible aliens: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182
United States — Muslim 1.0%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
► At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
► From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply (United States ). At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world:
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
► When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings) . Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons):
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%
► After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
► At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
► From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%
► After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Syria — Muslim 90%
► 100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’, the ‘Islamic House of Peace.’ There is supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:
Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%
Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.
Since 1947 they have Slaughtered nearly 15 million of their very own Followers….And you want to trust them with your Families….Really?
So…We Must Ask Ourselves.
Can A Good Muslim Be A Good American.
Theologically – no . . . Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia
Religiously – no. Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)(Koran)
Scripturally – no. Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.
Geographically – no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
Socially – no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews..
Politically – no.Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America , the great Satan.
Domestically – no. Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34 )
Intellectually – no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
Philosophically – no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression.. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.
Spiritually – no. Because when we declare ‘one nation under God,’ the Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran’s 99 excellent names.
Therefore, after much study and deliberation. … Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. – – – They obviously cannot be both ‘good’ Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you wish, it’s still the truth. You had better believe it. The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future. The religious war is bigger than we know or understand.
Commented by Jeffrey Hardin
There is no such thing as a moderate Qur’an, meaning, there are no such moderate Muslim’s either….
I recommend you download the video as YouTube has been known to remove and ban truth, even when spoken by Muslims themselves, simply because Muslims complain about it.
In the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfBHEy76W6c an Imam recounts a visit by Khomeini to Iraq, and talks about Khomeini suggesting they stay at an Iraqi host’s house in the city of Utaifiyyah, in which Khomeini pressed a 4-5 year old girl into a temporary “marriage” or “Misyar”. He then sexually violated and sodomized the little girl “all night” “from the front as well as from the back even while she screams and cries”.
After having earlier referred to the little girl as “beautiful”, the imam delivering the account feigns disgust regarding Khomeini’s treatment of the little girl, but then declares “How could he have a temporary marriage with this little girl, when more grown up girls were around in the house. He could have had a temporary marriage with one of them.”
He thus seemed to indicate that he didn’t see anything wrong, except that the girl could have been a little older, and he must necessarily agree that 9 years is old enough, because that was how old Aisha was when Muhammad was doing her.
The video also offers valuable insight into the power of Imams trumping the common sense, reason, conscience and surviving shreds of humanity, if any, of their subordinates that are in bondage to Satan.
Q “What do you think about temporary marriage to a little child?”
A “Sayyid, my answer is your answer. Your action is the right one, you are the imam. You can make the verdict. It is not possible for somebody like me to differ from your opinion.”
It’s easy to see the purely reprobate nature of the monsters involved, particularly since rescuing the little girl when he heard her “screams and cries” “all night”, would seem to have not even occurred to this reprobate coward, or at least he certainly took no action to rescue the girl. Yet the little girl was obviously scarred for life as a result of the rape. How many more are there like her, since it takes the testimony of 4 men to bring a conviction of rape, against a Muslim. Particularly since the victim of rape is perceived as having dishonored her family, so it sometimes ends in her murder by the hand of her own father.
It’s all because Muhammad set the standard for sex with children in Islam, having married Aisha when she was 6 and consummating that marriage when she was just a 9 year old child, and he was a 53 year old. No honest Muslim will deny their prophets urges and desires in this regard, as his self-serving alter-ego “Allah” lavished on him all the wives he wanted – but only for him.
Prior to Muhammad’s stand-alone “religion” sex with children likely wasn’t an acceptable practice among Arabs, any more than it was any other culture then, or today.
Even the Hadith suggests this “When Abu Bakr came, Khawlah repeated what she had said. He replied, “She is [like] his brother’s daughter. Would she be appropriate for him?”
While I had seen this debate video some time ago, I thought it was an aberration. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht0eJaXc2Is However yesterday a YouTuber brought up the subject and I was made to realize that this practice isn’t obscure at all, and I did a search and found the opening video above that discusses this in the context of “temporary marriages” in Islam – that is, fornication and adultery masked by a false facade of “marriage”.
While we certainly wouldn’t want anyone to judge the Gospel of the perfect and sinless Messiah, by the vast majority of folks that have deceived themselves into believing they are Christians, the behavior of the Islamic self-proclaimed “prophet” Muhammad is the very best way to judge Islam. Judging the behavior of the fruit of Islam is fair game as well.
According to some Muslims, sex with 1 day, week, or year old infants, is permissible and is accomplished by “thighing”.
Khomeini on sex with children and the rules on injured children. “If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life.” “But this girl will not count as one of the man’s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl’s sister.”
A Muslim on sex allowed by “Allah” with a 1 year old girl.
There is no plausible deniability since those are Muslims – even imams – in those YouTubes discussing rape and mufa’khathat of children. However fundamental Muslims may not consider it rape since the father of the 4-5 year old girl “gave” her to Khomeini to abuse, like “Allah” “gave” to Muhammad 6 year old Aisha, sex slaves captured as “spoils of war”, and “Allah” also “gave” him 1/5 of all the property he and his boys stole from others.
“Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwahs (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shemary, the question forwarded to the committee by the grand scholar of the committee with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421 (Islamic calendar). The inquirer asked the following:
It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufa’khathat of the children (mufa’khathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs” which means placing the male member between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayer of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers – may Allah be please with her.
After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply:
It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kufar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the prophet, peace and prayer of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age. That is why [the prophet] peace and prayer of Allah be upon him placed his male [member] between her thighs and massaged it softly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his [male] member not like other believers.“
Isn’t that just like Islamic leaders? They blame western culture (and I for one have never heard of, nor could have even imagined this despicable horror before), for this – what they admit is a “wide spread” custom among Muslims – even though they later admit that their own “prophet” engaged in the behavior! Even crediting Muhammad’s super-human “member” as his excuse!
That’s akin to when they blame the Israeli Jews, for Islamic rape, murder, mayhem and misery, perpetrated all around the world. With 2 million killed in the Sudan alone!
Some claim there is no hadith making this practice lawful, but are there any Hadith making it unlawful? How did the term “mufa’khathat” come to be? From a Hollywood movie? Are there statutes on the books in Islamic countries outlawing this “widespread” practice? If so, how many men have ever been arrested for it? Does it require 4 witnesses to bring charges against the perpetrator as in the case of rape?
Some excuse Muhammad by claiming this practice is unlawful for followers, as the first paragraph above suggests, but that certainly wouldn’t be the only thing that was lawful for Muhammad but unlawful for his followers – like having more than 4 wives, or getting more than one’s proportionate share of looted “booty”. If this practice does not have roots in Muhammadanism then how did it come to “become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings”?
The fact that a committee had to “study the issue” in the first place, and a religious decree had to be issued in order for Muslims to know whether the practice of thighing children or even infants is right or wrong, tells us everything we need to know about what Muhammadanism does to the minds of Muhammad’s followers.
After reading “has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings” it occurred to me to revisit this video. I believed the reports that the children weren’t actually getting married, but in light of this practice it tends to get one shuddering about what might have gone on after night fell.
While looking for it I found this one where couples are paid $500 to get married. I wonder how much of that $500 “brides” like the one at the end of the video got to spend?
Muhammad’s child bride standard is copied by his devoted followers in the world today.
The above poor little child is still playing peek-a-boo!
Muslims are stuck believing that Muhammad’s alter-ego “Allah” “gave” his child bride Aisha to him, just as they are stuck having to believe “Allah” “gave” Muhammad and his boys sex slaves as “spoils of war – booty”, just as they must believe in Muhammad’s unwitnessed account of having ridden on a flying donkey-mule one night.
Again, sorry for the X-rated content, but I thought this information important enough to add to the long list of Muhammad’s reprobate behavior, that his followers – that still have consciences – should see in regard to the license their “prophet” gave their brethren. When will they finally be convicted by having to constantly excuse away the conspicuously reprobate behavior of the “prophet” of Islam, who WAS AS MUCH THE OPPOSITE of the sinless Messiah, as his “religious” invention is the EXACT OPPOSITE of the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel?
If Christians and Jews don’t become engaged in this epic battle, we will only have ourselves to blame, for the bleak future prospects we leave behind for our children.
Even atheists and agnostics (who Muslims kill out of hand rather than allowing them to live in dhimmitude), can become engaged in the battle through a purely secular standpoint, by focusing on the history of Mecca and origins of Islam and it’s rituals.
If you do not become engaged it will be your children and/or grandchildren, that will be compelled to prostrate themselves to the Quraish pagan’s black stone idol in Mecca and pray in the vain repetitions of the heathen, 5 times a day.
For Christians the scriptures not only define the enemy, but also describe the armament we are to use, to engage it. As is made so clear through all of the evil of Islam explored in this forum…
Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places]. 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:
There are tracts for Muslims on the last four websites listed at the bottom of this post. Why not leave one laying around where one of Muhammad’s followers might find it? Particularly from the more Muslim friendly http://www.islamandthetruth.com website.
There are also instructions for making your own.
Read More Here: http://www.brotherpete.com/index.php?topic=2589.0
From Thursday, Brunei citizens can be fined or jailed by Islamic courts for offences like not performing Friday prayers, pregnancy out of wedlock, propagating other religions and indecent behavior. (AP Photo/Vincent Thian, File)
Thank you Paul Weston for doing this interview with me this morning and to LGB for providing materials.
Read More Here; The Churchill Bust
After exposing videos of “ritual human sacrifices” of Christians by Muslims, a former Palestinian Liberation Organization member-turned-Christian has discovered a new set of shocking videos that show human slaughterhouses in which non-Muslims are executed.
The videos, posted by Walid Shoebat, and his son, Theodore Shoebat, are horrific, showing heads neatly lined up against a wall and bodies suspended by their feet in a room.
Also shown is the testimony of a witness who was threatened with being “sacrificed.”
“I have never seen something like this,” Shoebat told WND. “I have been investigating this story for the past two weeks. The story is probably the most horrific I have ever [done]. It proves with footage actual systematic [sl]aughterhouses of human beings, including Christians in Syria.”
The witness video, translated by Shoebat’s organization, Rescue Christians, includes the testimony of Saif Al-Adlubi, who inexplicably was identified for “sacrifice” but then not killed before government soldiers arrived.
“This is the reality of Islam, it is a pagan and utterly depraved and sadistic religion. It takes the soul of a man and purges any remnants of human affection from his very being. Look to your own soul, and understand your own obligation to help the Christians,” Shoebat said.
Islamist Watch (IW) maintains an extensive archive of news items on nonviolent Islamism in the Western world. The complete collection can be found here; lists organized by topic are accessible on the right side of the IW homepage.
The following are some of the recent developments covered in the IW database:
Federal judge backs NYPD’s counterterrorism tactics
Outraging Islamists, U.S. District Judge William Martini dismissed a lawsuit accusing the New York Police Department of violating Muslims’ civil rights by covertly investigating mosques, businesses, and student groups in New Jersey to identify possible terrorists. The plaintiffs, he explains, “have not alleged facts from which it can be plausibly inferred that they were targeted solely because of their religion. The more likely explanation for the surveillance was a desire to locate budding terrorist conspiracies” after 9/11. “The police could not have monitored New Jersey for Muslim terrorist activities without monitoring the Muslim community itself.” To the extent that Muslims experienced “adverse effects,” the secret program’s disclosure by the Associated Press is to blame. “Nowhere … do plaintiffs allege that they suffered harm prior” to that, he notes. An appeal was filed; a separate suit is pending in a Brooklyn court.
The ruling is the latest vindication of the NYPD and a win for common sense. Why does counterterrorism work gravitate to the Muslim community? Because that is where terrorists tend to be found. Other police departments would be wise to ignore the Islamists’ complaints, some of which compared the NYPD’s efforts to Japanese-American internment, and instead emulate the NYPD. With the anniversary of the Boston attacks near, they should heed an Investor’s Business Daily editorial: “If Boston authorities had been as proactive as their counterparts in New York, they might have caught the radicalization of the Tsarnaev brothers at their Cambridge mosque.”
Read More Here; http://www.islamist-watch.org/blog/2014/03/iw-news-brief-nypd-vindicated-islamists-united