Which Constitutional Rights Are The Media Going To Demand Congress To Regulate, Restrict and Suspend Next, Their First Perhaps?


 Jeffrey Ray Hardin

Its unconstitutional to regulate or restrict gun ownership…Period…

 

Gun laws are illegal, they are Unconstitutional and The Post and Courier of Charleston SC and other media outlets are advocating that Congress or the President suspend are Constitutional right and or make owning a gun very expensive, as so many other country’s are practicing today to restrict gun ownership……

 

What other Constitutional right requires background checks, what other constitutional right is lost or suspended if you commit a crime, what other constitutional right is restricted and regulated…What other constitutional right has laws written specifically to suspend them…

 

NONE!!!!

 

NOT A DAMN ONE…….SO WHY IS MY 2cd Amendment Constitutional Right Being Attacked, Regulated, Suspended, Restricted….

2cd Amendment II

 

How about letting Congress, the President and Senate start Suspending our 8th Amendment Constitutional Rights, to regulate them, suspend them, restrict them, write laws to say who it does and does not apply to, how would you nit wits live without the 8th protecting you…

 

You’re allowing it to happen to the 2cd aren’t you, and dare not you compare them either….

 

Congress cannot write laws that suspend a Constitutional right and here you twits are advocating they do…

26447b0c06cb28b3cdf41fc064744945_1M

My local Newspaper The Post and Courier as well as other Media outlets are screaming for more gun laws and regulations….

 

How about if Congress wrote laws to restrict their 1st Amendment Constitutional Rights. To regulate, to suspend their rights to write and say as they wish..Lets say they make laws that tell the media what they can and cannot write and publish….

 

They’re advocating that congress write laws to suspend, restrict and regulate my 2cd amendment Constitutional rights is as Unconstitutional as Congress stripping your paper of their 1st amendment rights…

 

 

They are a bunch of cowardly Politically Correct fools….Once the second goes, so will our first, third, fourth, fifth, six and eighth amendments and on and on until we have no freedoms left..

 

Its exactly what these people are doing by screaming that the 2cd amendment be suspended….They’re surrendering their very own freedoms by advocating mine be taken away, don’t they see that?!

1stamendment


It’s bad enough when the peoples government, on any level, blatantly disregards our freedoms, our rights. Its made worse when Americans themselves are demanding others surrender their Constitutional rights while screaming we respect and honor theirs….

 

Sooner or later, they’ll find themselves standing alone with no one to fight for them, because they helped to silence the Brave…

 

 

The Constitution was written to protect our Natural rights.
The Constitution doesn’t grant us our rights, it recognizes them…..

 

80,000,000 American gun owners and we are allowing our Gun rights being taken away from us like candy from children……..

 

 

Our forefathers would mock and toy with us like the children we are today due to the pusillanimous conduct of our males cowering before this corrupt government….

 

 

Sickening, 80,000,000 strong and we do nothing.

If they are going demand restrictions, regulations and suspensions of our constitutional rights, then advocate that the President, Congress and the Senate do so Constitutionally…

They do that through Article Five of the Constitution, they ratify constitutional law and make amendments, -NOT- by illegally written Federal and State laws that restrict, regulate and suspend a Constitutional Right…

Now there is the right way to go about this and ONE I would honor….

If you do not understand the consequences of the demands you are making against the 2cd amendment then I pity you…Because you are essentially surrendering your Constitutional rights out of fear and misinformation…


How about if congress take your fist amendment right, OH, how about your eighth, or perhaps all of your rights…


I know, how about we give harsher longer deadlier sentences to criminals who use a gun in the commission of a crime…

Why are these anti-gun crusaders not advocating against the criminals who commit these horrible gun crimes, but are instead rallying against law abiding Constitutionally protected American Citizens…These bleeding heart crusaders feign sympathy towards the gun victims and then turn right around and demand lighter sentencing for criminals who use guns in the commissions of their crimes…Its nothing more than a show for them to rid us of our defenses.


We gun owners are 80,000,000 strong, why are we not rising up and using our numbers to defend our Constitutional Rights….

 

 

The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


Firstly….Any regulations and restrictions to our owning firearms are absolutely UNCONSTITUTIONAL…They are Illegal.

Either our Second Amendment gives us a right to bear arms that shall not be infringed upon, or it does not, One Or.

The 2cd Amendment states: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Secondly….The 2cd amendment is the only Constitutional Law being regulated and gun ownership restricted by laws meant to disarming us, the 2cd amendment is the only Constitutional Law that is being regulated, and it is illegal to infringe upon anyone’s right to own and carry their firearms in the manner they choose.

NOTE: The 1790 Naturalization Immigration Act as an argument against our Government making laws that attempt to change the meaning of Constitutional Laws….

23 of our original founding Fathers attempted to make a Temporary clarification by the Congress of natural born citizen changing the meaning of Article II clause I section V of the Constitution by wrongfully installing a Congressional Law to redefine a Constitutional Law.

In 1795 it was repealed because those 23 Founding Fathers realized it was UNCONSTITUTIONAL… Neither the President of the United States nor Congress or the Senate cannot change the wording nor meanings of a Constitutional Law without first Ratifying or making amendments to those constitutional laws and the articles within them.

Our Founding Fathers failed and later realized that they did not follow their own Constitutional Laws and the 1790 Act was repealed 5 years later by the 1795 act….The 2cd amendment is the only Constitutional Law today that if you commit a crime, you can loose your Constitutional Rights…

The President, Congress and the Senate are using the National Firearms Act of 1934 to strip us of our 2cd amendment rights, they are making what should be misdemeanor crimes into felonies today to widen those restrictions.

In 1968, the U.S. Congress passed the Gun Control Act, and it was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson. One of the primary purposes of the legislation was to further regulate interstate transfers of firearms. However, the law also reinforced existing federal law that made it illegal for a felon to own a gun. Although Congress had already passed the National Firearms Act of 1934, which made it illegal for felons convicted of a violent crime to own a gun, the Gun Control Act expanded the prohibition to include all felony crimes.

An ACT, LAW, STATUTE, nor a DECREE cannot suspend our 2cd amendment constitutional rights to bear arms.

How exactly is that being allowed Constitutionally by those sworn to uphold our Constitution?

Thirdly…If the congress, senate, and or President want to regulate gun ownership and or restrict gun ownership, then they must first, either ratify or make amendments to the 2cd amendment, they cannot legally make laws or statutes or decrees that restrict the 2cd amendment, its unlawful for them to do that…

As was the case with the 1790 Immigration and Naturalization Act, any law made that regulates and or restricts our Constitutional rights must be repealed.

Any elected official who takes an oath of office to the United States swears to uphold, defend and protect the Constitution of the United States of America at all cost to their life and safety,

if they betrayed that oath, they should be recalled immediately from office….Any and all attempts to change a Constitutional Law with a State or Federal law is 100% illegal and an attack and betrayal against our Constitutional Republic, and those who sign these laws should be arrested and or recalled from their elected offices.

Background checks, laws or statutes forbidding the sale of firearms to felons are unconstitutional….The only way Congress and the Senate can make those types of restrictions and changes to the Constitution are to make amendments, not laws.

These elected officials are betraying our Constitutional 2cd Amendment right to bear and to own the firearms of our choice, they, nor the Congress, Senate and the President have a right to tell us when where who or how we can carry, own, present our firearms… There are no such restrictions and or regulations written in our 2cd amendment that does….

Lastly…Anyone of our elected officials who believes that background checks, acts, regulations, restrictions made against Citizens of the United States to own firearms are going to keep them out of the hands of criminals are both fools and criminals themselves…

These laws and regulations aren’t created to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, they’re laws created to UNCONSTITUTIONALLY infringe upon the rights of Law Abiding Citizens to own firearms…

They are created to slowly disarm us..

These law makers are using unconstitutional laws to intimidate and silence us with, and we are allowing them too…

BREAKING: Tennessee Senate Passes Unlicensed Open Carry Bill || by Dan Cannon


Screen-Shot-2014-04-08-at-5.56.42-PM-300x178

The Tennessee State Senate approved a bill by a vote of 25-2 that would legalize unlicensed open carry in the Volunteer State.

The companion bill is still awaiting a vote in the state house and the governor would still need to sign the bill before it became law.

According to a local media report,

Read More Here;   BREAKING: Tennessee Senate Passes Unlicensed Open Carry Bill

Anti-gun Surgeon General Nominee in Serious Trouble, Thanks to You! || Courtesy; Gun Owners .org


Gun Owners Of America II

Anti-gun Surgeon General Nominee in Serious Trouble, Thanks to You!
— Plus, GOA needs your help to stick it to fascist states like NY and CT

“Past comments [Vivek Murthy] made in support of gun control have drawn strong opposition from the National Rifle Association and Gun Owners of America.” — The Huffington Post, March 17, 2014


Not a GOA member yet?  Click here to join Gun Owners of America!  And  click here  to TAKE ACTION on today’s alert.


SURGEON GENERAL PICK ON LIFE SUPPORT, THANKS TO GUN OWNERS

It’s not time to declare victory yet.

But it is interesting that the White House is publicly considering delaying the vote on the Vivek Murthy nomination to be Surgeon General until after the November elections.

We alerted you in early February to the problems with this anti-gun nominee for the post of Surgeon General.  As a physician and pro-Obama activist, Murthy actively advocated gun bans, magazine bans, and gun registration.

According to yesterday’s Huffington Post, Murthy’s support for a ban on semi-automatic firearms “isn’t sitting well with powerful leaders in the gun lobby” like Gun Owners of America.  And today, the liberal Huffington Post said that “bellyaching” from “Gun Owners of America has given unfortunate pause to common sense in Congress.”

An unfortunate pause to common sense? Well, we did point out the Huffington Post is liberal.

Thankfully, because of the united pro-gun opposition to Murthy, ten Democrats are now considering voting against this Surgeon General nomination. Since the only Republican defection thus far is Mark Kirk of Illinois, this would be enough to defeat Murthy, even with the illegal nomination-related rules changes Democrat Leader Harry Reid enacted last November.

Interestingly, according to Saturday’s New York Times, one of the options considered by the White House would be to delay the nomination until January, when, it hopes, newly reelected “red state” Democrats like Mark Begich (D-AK), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Mark Pryor (D-AR), John Walsh (D-MT), Mark Udall (D-CO), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), and Mark Warner (D-VA) would be once again free to vote anti-gun.

Hopefully, gun owners will have something to say about the outcome of these and other races.

STUTZMAN RECIPROCITY BILL WOULD STICK IT TO FASCIST STATES LIKE NY AND CT

By now, you’ve probably heard that states like New York and Connecticut have responded to Newtown by going into “full confiscation mode:”

* New York City is sending out letters to registered gun owners, demanding that they relinquish guns holding more than seven rounds.

* In Connecticut, the Hartford Courant is insisting that the state imprison up to 300,000 gun owners who have not complied with the most recent registration demands.

All of the time, we are receiving e-mails from gun owners in these states and elsewhere, demanding that something be done about these atrocities against the Constitution.

We are working with litigators to try to challenge states such as these in court — in the face of a judiciary which is increasingly packed by Obama with anti-gun judges.

But one thing we can do to force states like New York and Connecticut to recognize the Constitution is to pass reciprocity legislation like H.R. 578, which has been introduced by Congressman Marlin Stutzman in the House and currently has 38 cosponsors.

Why is this important?

Because, under H.R. 578, federal law would compel states like New York and Connecticut to “allow” concealed carry holders from other states to walk their streets without being compelled to submit their names to state gun registries.

To those who would argue that New York and Connecticut would violate federal law and never allow this, our response is “Make my day!” H.R. 578 would put Andrew Cuomo and Daniel Malloy in the role of constitutional bigots, standing in the school house door in order to defy federal law.

(And besides, the Supreme Court ruled in McDonald v. Chicago that the Congress does have power, under the 14th Amendment, to protect American citizens who are having their gun rights violated by states and localities.)

Some believe there is going to be an electoral revolution in Connecticut this November or a few years hence. Nothing could add more fuel to that fire than the realization of residents that people from other states have constitutional rights, but not them.

H.R. 578 is, by far, the preferable reciprocity bill, because it recognizes constitutional carry states like Vermont, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Vermont and Wyoming — and does not require their residents to change their laws or get permits in order to benefit from it.

Another bill (H.R. 2959), being pushed by another gun group, would require Vermont to repeal its pro-gun laws and would require residents of constitutional carry states to get optional permits. While that’s not horrible, it does deter other states from adopting constitutional carry laws.

In addition, the Cornyn-Thune counterpart in the Senate, like H.R. 578, recognizes constitutional carry states — and is the version that garnered a supermajority of 57 votes in the Senate just last year. So what would be the point in passing the less preferable version in the House, only to have it sent to an interminable House-Senate conference!

H.R. 578 is the preferable reciprocity bill.  But we need to increase its current 38 cosponsors.

ACTION:  Contact your Representative . Ask him to cosponsor H.R. 578. Tell him he should cosponsor H.R. 578, even if he has already sponsored a reciprocity bill which is not as good.

View this alert as a webpage.


Please do not reply directly to this message, as your reply will bounce back as undeliverable.
Please forward this e-mail to friends and family
Gun Owners of America
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102
Springfield, VA 22151
703-321-8585
www.gunowners.org
Contact Form

Bill to Register all Firearms Introduced in Illinois ||by Bob Adelmann


2671b0975d5ec8b73d11518a0fd29b53_M

Another anti-gun bill mandating (this time) the registration of every firearm in the state of Illinois (plus permission slips to purchase ammunition) was introduced last month by self-proclaimed LGBT activist and progressive Democrat Kelly Cassidy. Representing state district 14, Cassidy’s bill is called simply: “Firearms Registration Act.” Cassidy’s goal is simple: She wants the Illinois State Police to know where every firearm in the state is, what its registration number is, who owns it, and where they live. From her bill:

Every person in the State must register each firearm he or she owns or possesses in according with the Act….

[The Act] provides that the Department of State Police must complete a background check of any person who applies for … a registration certificate for a firearm that was lawfully owned or possessed on the effective date of the Act….

 

[The Act] provides that it is a Class 2 felony to sell or transfer ownership of a firearm to another person without complying with the registration requirements of [the Act].

She also wants the police to know who’s buying and shooting ammunition:

[The Act] provides that a person shall not purchase or possess ammunition within this State without having first obtained a registration certificate identifying a firearm that is suitable for use with that ammunition.

Penalties for noncompliance are severe: A Class 2 felony in Illinois is three to seven years in jail, plus a fine not to exceed $200,000.

Read More Here:  Bill to Register all Firearms Introduced in Illinois

Gun Owners Prepare to Seize Senate from Harry Reid ||Written by Gun Owners | Courtesy; Gun Owners of America.org


Gun Owners Of America II

At GOA’s request, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has bypassed Harry Reid’s stranglehold on the Senate by bringing a pro-gun bill directly onto the Senate calendar.

The bill is H.R. 4118, and it was approved by the House of Representatives on Wednesday by a 250-160 vote.  (See the vote here, with “Yea” being the pro-gun vote.)  The bill would suspend the individual mandate of the anti-gun ObamaCare program for one year, thus protecting the privacy of gun owners.

Normally, bills that pass out of one chamber are referred to a committee in the other chamber.  But Senator Paul intervened by using a parliamentary technique to bring H.R. 4118 onto the calendar, rather than letting it be referred to a Senate committee.

Now that H.R. 4118 is “on the calendar,” this means that ANY SENATOR can now “move to proceed” to the bill, thereby CIRCUMVENTING HARRY REID’S STRANGLEHOLD over the Senate agenda.

This is huge.

It is important to gun owners because ObamaCare lays the groundwork for taking millions of Americans — those taking anxiety medications or who have PTSD or ADHD — and feeding their names into NICS’s gun-ban database.

It is important because, already, Obama, by executive fiat, has waived federal privacy laws to clear the way for these gun bans.

 

Read More Here: Click here to view this alert on the web.

‘Deal killer’: Why some conservatives won’t support Ben Carson for president || Michael Dorstewitz


Untitled

Dr. Benjamin Carson’s rip-roaring speech Saturday had the Conservative Political Action Conference attendees all fired up — everyone except The Blaze’s Dana Loesch, who said Carson’s support for gun control is a deal killer for her.

Carson has been a darling of the right ever since his address at the National Prayer Breakfast last year, when he repeatedly attacked the president’s policies, with Obama seated less than 10 feet away.

Carson’s CPAC speech revived the same excitement, and elicited thoughts of a presidential run. Many took to Twitter using the hashtag #RunBenRun. Here are a few examples, the first from Independent Journal’s Kira Davis:

Read More Here: ‘Deal killer’: Why some conservatives won’t support Ben Carson for president