The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


Firstly….Any regulations and restrictions to our owning firearms are absolutely UNCONSTITUTIONAL…They are Illegal.

Either our Second Amendment gives us a right to bear arms that shall not be infringed upon, or it does not, One Or.

The 2cd Amendment states: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Secondly….The 2cd amendment is the only Constitutional Law being regulated and gun ownership restricted by laws meant to disarming us, the 2cd amendment is the only Constitutional Law that is being regulated, and it is illegal to infringe upon anyone’s right to own and carry their firearms in the manner they choose.

NOTE: The 1790 Naturalization Immigration Act as an argument against our Government making laws that attempt to change the meaning of Constitutional Laws….

23 of our original founding Fathers attempted to make a Temporary clarification by the Congress of natural born citizen changing the meaning of Article II clause I section V of the Constitution by wrongfully installing a Congressional Law to redefine a Constitutional Law.

In 1795 it was repealed because those 23 Founding Fathers realized it was UNCONSTITUTIONAL… Neither the President of the United States nor Congress or the Senate cannot change the wording nor meanings of a Constitutional Law without first Ratifying or making amendments to those constitutional laws and the articles within them.

Our Founding Fathers failed and later realized that they did not follow their own Constitutional Laws and the 1790 Act was repealed 5 years later by the 1795 act….The 2cd amendment is the only Constitutional Law today that if you commit a crime, you can loose your Constitutional Rights…

The President, Congress and the Senate are using the National Firearms Act of 1934 to strip us of our 2cd amendment rights, they are making what should be misdemeanor crimes into felonies today to widen those restrictions.

In 1968, the U.S. Congress passed the Gun Control Act, and it was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson. One of the primary purposes of the legislation was to further regulate interstate transfers of firearms. However, the law also reinforced existing federal law that made it illegal for a felon to own a gun. Although Congress had already passed the National Firearms Act of 1934, which made it illegal for felons convicted of a violent crime to own a gun, the Gun Control Act expanded the prohibition to include all felony crimes.

An ACT, LAW, STATUTE, nor a DECREE cannot suspend our 2cd amendment constitutional rights to bear arms.

How exactly is that being allowed Constitutionally by those sworn to uphold our Constitution?

Thirdly…If the congress, senate, and or President want to regulate gun ownership and or restrict gun ownership, then they must first, either ratify or make amendments to the 2cd amendment, they cannot legally make laws or statutes or decrees that restrict the 2cd amendment, its unlawful for them to do that…

As was the case with the 1790 Immigration and Naturalization Act, any law made that regulates and or restricts our Constitutional rights must be repealed.

Any elected official who takes an oath of office to the United States swears to uphold, defend and protect the Constitution of the United States of America at all cost to their life and safety,

if they betrayed that oath, they should be recalled immediately from office….Any and all attempts to change a Constitutional Law with a State or Federal law is 100% illegal and an attack and betrayal against our Constitutional Republic, and those who sign these laws should be arrested and or recalled from their elected offices.

Background checks, laws or statutes forbidding the sale of firearms to felons are unconstitutional….The only way Congress and the Senate can make those types of restrictions and changes to the Constitution are to make amendments, not laws.

These elected officials are betraying our Constitutional 2cd Amendment right to bear and to own the firearms of our choice, they, nor the Congress, Senate and the President have a right to tell us when where who or how we can carry, own, present our firearms… There are no such restrictions and or regulations written in our 2cd amendment that does….

Lastly…Anyone of our elected officials who believes that background checks, acts, regulations, restrictions made against Citizens of the United States to own firearms are going to keep them out of the hands of criminals are both fools and criminals themselves…

These laws and regulations aren’t created to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, they’re laws created to UNCONSTITUTIONALLY infringe upon the rights of Law Abiding Citizens to own firearms…

They are created to slowly disarm us..

These law makers are using unconstitutional laws to intimidate and silence us with, and we are allowing them too…

Advertisements

Former Supreme Court Justice Wants to “Clarify” 2nd Amendment || by Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.


0bb0a040df8e18fa39937c6ba1f3d3b0_M

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens believes the Second Amendment should be amended.

In order to clear up what one commentator calls the “exquisitely awkward 18th century syntax,” Stevens proposes adding five words to the present version of the Second Amendment. Stevens’ revised Second Amendment would read:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the militia shall not be infringed.

 

In his newest book, Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution, Stevens offers the following defense of his proposed change:

Emotional claims that the right to possess deadly weapons is so important that it is protected by the federal Constitution distort intelligent debate about the wisdom of particular aspects of proposed legislation designed to minimize the slaughter caused by the prevalence of guns in private hands.

Slaughter caused by the prevalence of guns in private hands? The fact is that it is governments, not civilians, that have been responsible for the killing of over 300 million people in the 20th century alone.

Stevens’ proposal not only would allow regimes to retain access to their weapons, but would leave private citizens powerless to oppose future slaughters.

Read More Here:  http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/17751-former-supreme-court-justice-wants-to-clarify-2nd-amendment