Which Constitutional Rights Are The Media Going To Demand Congress To Regulate, Restrict and Suspend Next, Their First Perhaps?

 Jeffrey Ray Hardin

Its unconstitutional to regulate or restrict gun ownership…Period…


Gun laws are illegal, they are Unconstitutional and The Post and Courier of Charleston SC and other media outlets are advocating that Congress or the President suspend are Constitutional right and or make owning a gun very expensive, as so many other country’s are practicing today to restrict gun ownership……


What other Constitutional right requires background checks, what other constitutional right is lost or suspended if you commit a crime, what other constitutional right is restricted and regulated…What other constitutional right has laws written specifically to suspend them…




NOT A DAMN ONE…….SO WHY IS MY 2cd Amendment Constitutional Right Being Attacked, Regulated, Suspended, Restricted….

2cd Amendment II


How about letting Congress, the President and Senate start Suspending our 8th Amendment Constitutional Rights, to regulate them, suspend them, restrict them, write laws to say who it does and does not apply to, how would you nit wits live without the 8th protecting you…


You’re allowing it to happen to the 2cd aren’t you, and dare not you compare them either….


Congress cannot write laws that suspend a Constitutional right and here you twits are advocating they do…


My local Newspaper The Post and Courier as well as other Media outlets are screaming for more gun laws and regulations….


How about if Congress wrote laws to restrict their 1st Amendment Constitutional Rights. To regulate, to suspend their rights to write and say as they wish..Lets say they make laws that tell the media what they can and cannot write and publish….


They’re advocating that congress write laws to suspend, restrict and regulate my 2cd amendment Constitutional rights is as Unconstitutional as Congress stripping your paper of their 1st amendment rights…



They are a bunch of cowardly Politically Correct fools….Once the second goes, so will our first, third, fourth, fifth, six and eighth amendments and on and on until we have no freedoms left..


Its exactly what these people are doing by screaming that the 2cd amendment be suspended….They’re surrendering their very own freedoms by advocating mine be taken away, don’t they see that?!


It’s bad enough when the peoples government, on any level, blatantly disregards our freedoms, our rights. Its made worse when Americans themselves are demanding others surrender their Constitutional rights while screaming we respect and honor theirs….


Sooner or later, they’ll find themselves standing alone with no one to fight for them, because they helped to silence the Brave…



The Constitution was written to protect our Natural rights.
The Constitution doesn’t grant us our rights, it recognizes them…..


80,000,000 American gun owners and we are allowing our Gun rights being taken away from us like candy from children……..



Our forefathers would mock and toy with us like the children we are today due to the pusillanimous conduct of our males cowering before this corrupt government….



Sickening, 80,000,000 strong and we do nothing.

If they are going demand restrictions, regulations and suspensions of our constitutional rights, then advocate that the President, Congress and the Senate do so Constitutionally…

They do that through Article Five of the Constitution, they ratify constitutional law and make amendments, -NOT- by illegally written Federal and State laws that restrict, regulate and suspend a Constitutional Right…

Now there is the right way to go about this and ONE I would honor….

If you do not understand the consequences of the demands you are making against the 2cd amendment then I pity you…Because you are essentially surrendering your Constitutional rights out of fear and misinformation…

How about if congress take your fist amendment right, OH, how about your eighth, or perhaps all of your rights…

I know, how about we give harsher longer deadlier sentences to criminals who use a gun in the commission of a crime…

Why are these anti-gun crusaders not advocating against the criminals who commit these horrible gun crimes, but are instead rallying against law abiding Constitutionally protected American Citizens…These bleeding heart crusaders feign sympathy towards the gun victims and then turn right around and demand lighter sentencing for criminals who use guns in the commissions of their crimes…Its nothing more than a show for them to rid us of our defenses.

We gun owners are 80,000,000 strong, why are we not rising up and using our numbers to defend our Constitutional Rights….




Trey Gowdy, Betrays the Constitution to Support Marco Rubio’s Ineligibility, As are many other Americans

And another Champion of the People and Constitution bites the Dust,,,,There is no candidate who is more clearly defined as Ineligible than Marco Rubio, and Trey Gowdy knows it…


Neither Marco Rubio nor Bobby Jindals parents were American Citizens at the time of their births….I am so tired of seeing our Constitution Battered and Neglected in this Manner, if our Constitution is destroyed, than so will all our other Protections be destroyed…

All of our Protections people, including our precious and very fragile freedoms along with it.

Add in the Ineligible Ted Cruz and we have the makings for future Foreign Presidents….Don’t think so, than your a blind fool, that or terribly misinformed or outright compliant to our Nations destruction.

Why, for what other reason would any of you want to make allowances for Marco Rubio and those like himself except for your enabling them to further destroy this Nation and mind you, all of you….The Constitution of  The United States of America was not set up, structured, constructed and sealed AROUND each and every AMERICAN to protect THEM only, but to also protect this NATION from our enemies and from especially outside INFLUENCES that might destroy us from WITHIN, thus meaning FOREIGN Intrusions into our highest offices of the Presidency and Vice Presidency, our House and Senate which are all protected by these very FRAGILE PIECES of FOUNDING DOCUMENTS….

You and I, the American People, PATRIOTS all, are the Backbone of our CONSTITUTION  and we are seriously BROKEN…

Can you understand what “WE ARE BROKEN” means to us?

That Americans are the ones making these allowances, We the People, America’s Patriot’s are, and many others will soon follow our lead…Have they not already followed Barack Obama’s?

Once these allowances are made for those who are ineligible, no one will ever be able to challenge them again and that will have very serious and unprecedented consequences upon each and everyone of us as Americans and our Nation and especially our future generations, what we allow now will in fact impact their lives dramatically.

And we can stop the wrongful usurpation of this Nation today, its so insanely easy, simply don’t support them, don’t vote for them, let them know the reason you aren’t voting for or supporting them is because they do not meet our Framers requirements for the Presidency and make it known LOUD and clear so that other INELIGIBLE CANDIDATES know that as  her first and last Defenders American Patriots will not tolerate nor support their INELIGIBILITY.


Close it now before this goes any further or mark my words, not only will you be culpable to your own destruction, but also the destruction of your family’s, your neighbors and this Nation’s security, as well as our future generations of Americans.

Has not Obama or his actions given any of you, any of you, a clear enough understanding or insight into what would follow after him if we continued to make allowances for ineligible candidates, redefining the requirements our Framers set in stone for our future Presidents eligibility?

Obama’s INELIGIBILITY has ENCOURAGE others with the same status to run for our highest office because they too think they can get away with it, and thus far, they have, and our corrupted do nothing traitorous Congress has cleared the path for him and that alone should concern all of you,  why would they enable Obama, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio to circumvent CONSTITUTIONAL LAW?

Why aren’t you Americans asking yourself that, or do you even care any more?

Where in our History has so many questionable Candidates ran for office, and at what time in our history has so many Ineligible candidates ran for our highest offices and don’t you for a moment suspect that something is amiss, that this comes right after Obama’s Illegal Presidency?

This is being Encouraged and you Americans, many of you God fearing Patriots are Allowing it by supporting them….

STOP IT, for the love of this Nation, STOP & THINK…Please research this for yourself.

If we continue to allow this, It won’t be long until we have Foreign President’s ruling over our children making law…THAT”S RIGHT, MAKING LAW, and don’t any of you dare tell me that will never happen when we have an Ineligible President now who is occupying our White House already, and he is MAKING LAWS that are aimed against AMERICANS and are favoring our Enemies….,don’t you even dare…

AND THAT MY DEAR PRECIOUS FRIENDS, are what they want, people who can work outside of our Constitution, the very same Constitution that many of you have professed you would die to protect, the very same document that many have already made the ultimate sacrifice for and the very same DOCUMENT you are now helping to destroy by allowing these Unconstitutional Exceptions into our highest offices….WHY??

NO ONE, not the President, not Congress, not the Senate nor Supreme Courts or States can change any of the wording within our Constitution to make them mean anything less than what our Founders interpreted them to mean….No Person or Persons have the Power to Do That.

So I have to ask, why are you trying to?

Am I to understand now that our Constitution is meaningless any more… Is that what you Patriots are Saying today?

Because that’s exactly what I am hearing and reading everywhere I go by the Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio supporters, as well as Bobby Jindals supporters before he stepped down, and if it doesn’t matter to you, then that breaks my heart…

Because, how can any of you who are supporting these Ineligible Candidates turn right around and honor and celebrate this Nation, our Constitution, Her Heroes and Veterans who sacrificed so much to protect this Nation and our Constitution with their lives, when you are now culpable in its very destruction…..

And, your doing it with a STRAIGHT FACE?

Blood & Soil, Descent & Territory = Natural Born

Anyone who is made a Citizen through an Act of Law is Naturalized…Not Natural Born.

People are mistaking Citizens at Birth with Natural Born, nor will they differentiate Citizen at Birth from Natural Born….

All Natural Born Natives are Citizens at Birth….
However, not all Citizens at Birth are Natural Born…

Anyone who is made a Citizen through an ACT of Law is a Naturalized Citizen and is not eligible for the Presidency.

A Natural Born Citizen would not have to renounce another Citizenship….Ted Cruz has.

One must be born upon American Soil to TWO Parents who are BOTH AMERICAN CITIZENS…To Meet The Natural Born Requirements to become eligible for the Presidency…

Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jindal nor had Obama met any of these Requirements for the Presidency, and they never will.

That Is A Fact, You Cannot Change Constitutional Law.

What we are seeing today with Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio as was the case of Barack OBAMA… IS,,,,The Willful Subversion of America’s Founding Document’s, By Both Sides of the Isle, and many of you are playing right into their hands!

Read Here: Trey Gowdy Twists Natural Born Citizen Qualification to Support Marco Rubio



Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defines a Natural Born Citizen in1789 In defining an [Article II “natural born Citizen]…



Defining Natural-Born Citizen by P.A. Madison on November 18th, 2008






Source: Attorney Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

March 13, 2015 http://puzo1.blogspot.com



Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defined Natural Born Citizenship in 1789 – by Atty Mario Apuzzo



A Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What & For How Long?



The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth



Senator Ted Cruz Is Not a “Natural Born Citizen” and Therefore Not Eligible to Be President



The Fallacies of Congressional Legislative Attorney Jack Maskell’s Definition of a “Natural Born Citizen”



Birthright Citizenship in the United States: A Global Comparison



See: Publius Huldah’s important article on this subject…http://newswithviews.com/Publius/huldah110.htm



Defining Natural-Born Citizen: The Debate Over Who Qualifies To Run For President…http://ivn.us/2013/08/13/defining-natural-born-citizen/



Truth, the Whole Truth, & Nothing but the Truth – Cruz Control…




Cruz Control – Part II




Obama never certified by Hawaii Democratic Party



Absolute Proof the Founders Knew and Accepted Vattel`s French “naturels” to mean “natural born” in English Before Constitution Was Written…



Trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “natural born Citizens (NBC)” are “Citizens at birth (CAB)” but not all “CAB” are “NBC”!



John Jay’s letter to George Washington dated 25 Jul 1787:



1775 Benjamin Franklin Wrote Vatel

A Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What & For How Long?



CVJ5dUOUAAAWQt4.jpg large


Presidential Eligibility Tutorial




7 FAM 1131.6-3 …Not Citizens by “Naturalization”

(CT:CON-474; 08-19-2013) http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf


US Constitution


Cruz, Obama, Rubio nor Jindal meet any of these requirements…


Excellent article: Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/07/natural-born-citizen-matter-republicans-democrats/#3eTYHl4oG1Fsxbmj.99


Constitutional Qualifications  House of Representatives

4 Supreme Court Cases define “natural born citizen” | The Post & Email



Vatel Eligibilty Natural Born

4 SUPREME COURT CASES DEFINE ‘NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'(Updated May 25, 2012) http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1308252582



 1790 Nationality Act repealed by the 1795 Immigration act

Check out sections 3 (correction of definition) -and- 4 (repeal of 1790 act).




June 11, 2003, Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Ark., brought HJR 59. It was intended to “permit persons who are not natural born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 35 years, to be eligible to hold the offices of president and vice president.”




Sept. 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., brought HJR67, which would have done the same as Snyder’s, only the requirement to be a citizen was lowered to 20 years.




Feb. 25, 2004, Sen. Don Nickles, R-Okla., brought S.B. 2128 to “try to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural born citizen requirement.” But it defined NBC as someone who was born in and is subject to the United States,” which was not the understanding of the framers of the Constitution.




Sept. 15, 2004, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., brought HJR 104, “to make eligible for the office of president a person who is not a natural born citizen of the United States but has been a United States citizen for at least 20 years.”




Jan. 4, 2005, Conyers, D-Mich., HJR2, the same as Rohrabacher’s.





Feb. 1, 2005, HJR15, Rohrabacher, to require only 20 years citizenship to be eligible for the office of president.




April 14, 2005, Snyder, HJR42, requiring 35 years’ citizenship.





Feb. 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., tried to attach to SB 2678, Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act, an amendment clarifying what “natural-born citizen” includes. Obama and then-Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., were sponsors.





Sen. John McCain’s qualifications as a “natural-born citizen.”





References – internet links to documents for determining types of citizenship





Law of Nations
§ 213. Inhabitants.

“The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners, who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound to the society by their residence, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside in it; and they are obliged to defend it, because it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the rights of citizens. They enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. The perpetual inhabitants are those who have received the right of perpetual residence. These are a kind of citizens of an inferior order, and are united to the society without participating in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their fathers; and, as the state has given to these the right of perpetual residence, their right passes to their posterity.”

“U.S. national is a person born in or having ties with “an outlying possession of the United States” which is as of 2005, only American Samoa and Swains Island.

Additionally, it also includes those individuals born abroad to two U.S. national parents, or those born abroad to one alien parent and one U.S. national parent. Additionally, there is a residency requirement for the parents of the child prior to birth in order to transmit U.S. nationality. “

Rights and Restrictions

U.S. nationals cannot vote in any election or hold elected office.

•Allowed to work and reside anywhere in the U.S. without restrictions.
•Eligible to apply for U.S. passport just like U.S. citizens. In fact, there is no difference between the passport for U.S. national and U.S. citizen. Both of them mention the ‘Nationality – USA’.
•Eligible to apply for U.S. citizenship through naturalization under the same rules as other permanent residents.






Summary: Throughout U.S. history, various authorities have expressed the viewpoint that birthplace alone determines federal citizenship. Except for Lynch v. Clarke (1844), case law does not support this viewpoint. In Lynch v. Clarke, Vice-Chancellor Sandford ruled that Julia Lynch was a New York State citizen at birth, even though her parents were not citizens at the time of her birth. In his dicta, the Vice-Chancellor expressed his (non-legally-binding) opinion that Miss Lynch, in addition to being a citizen, was also a natural born citizen. The fact that Miss Lynch was deemed to be a natural born citizen according to a State judge’s dicta does not necessarily mean that she was a natural born citizen under the Federal Constitution Cici, Lynch v. Clarke was decided in New York state court. It is not binding in Federal matters.



Of particular note is that it was cited by Justice Gray in the case of US v. Wong Kim Ark and yet Justice Gray still did not declare Wong Kim Ark to be a “natural born citizen”, but simply a citizen by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment.




Perkins v. Elg is actually a good case to reference. In it, Justice Hughes indicates that both Marie Elg and “young Steinkauler”, both of whom were born on US soil to naturalized US citizen parents, were natural born citizens.




Ankeny v. Gov. Daniels also was a state case and consequently is not binding in Federal court. I would also point out that it was wrongly decided, but that’s another matter.




In 1898, Supreme Court Justice Gray in delivering the majority opinion in the case of US v Wong Kim Ark stated “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, … by authority of Congress, exercised … by declaring certain classes of persons to be citizens, as in the enactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens …” [See: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649] That statement clearly indicates that children of citizens who are born outside US Territory, who gain their citizenship by Congressional statute are naturalized. In other words, simply having citizen parents isn’t enough to make a natural born citizen!



In 1951, Chief Judge Phillips in delivering the opinion in the case of Zimmer v. Acheson for the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit said of someone who was born outside the United States to two US citizen parents, acquiring their citizenship under Revised Statutes § 1993 (the precursor of todays 8 USC 1401), that the nature of their citizenship “status as a citizen was that of a naturalized citizen and not a native-born citizen.” [See: https://www.courtlistener.com/…/zimmer-v-acheson…/…]




In 1956, Judge Hamley, in delivering the opinion in the case of Wong Kam Wo v. Dulles for the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in a case pertaining to two men born outside the United States to a naturalized US citizen father, noted that Revised Statutes § 1993 (the precursor of todays 8 USC 1401) is “a naturalization law in the constitutional sense.” [See: https://www.courtlistener.com/…/wong-kam-wo-and…/…]




And in 1971, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, who just 4 years earlier had written the majority opinion in the case of Afroyim v. Rusk, had the following observation to make of foreign-born children of US citizens; “Although those Americans who acquire their citizenship under statutes conferring citizenship on the foreign-born children of citizens are not popularly thought of as naturalized citizens, the use of the word “naturalize” in this way has a considerable constitutional history. Congress is empowered by the Constitution to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” Art. I, 8. Anyone acquiring citizenship solely under the exercise of this power is, constitutionally speaking, a naturalized citizen.”




The position of the courts for well over a century is that foreign born children of US citizens who acquire their citizenship wholly through Congressional statutes or by Act of Law are “naturalized” citizens. Not, Natural Born Citizens and not Eligible for the Presidency or Vice Presidency.

Self Preservation Party

As Synonymous as Americans are to America, So is Blood to Soil, Descent to Territory: And for One to be Natural Born, they must be born in the country to Parents who are its Citizens.

Constitutional Qualifications  House of Representatives


As Synonymous as Americans are to America, So are Blood to Soil, Descent to Territory.

We have forever celebrated the land we have occupied and cultivated, and have always placed a high value on her virtues, virtues that sprang forth from its Constitutional foundations and traditions that were greatly influenced by the Natural Laws of God that made this Republic so exceptional.

The universe obeys certain rules—laws to which all things must adhere. These laws are precise, and all of them are in nature inspired by God and unchangeable, as are our Constitution…

Our Constitutional Laws are written in such a way as to inspire men to do great things under its freedoms and protections under God….

On June 14 (Flag Day), 1954 President Dwight D. Eisenhower approved adding the words “under God.”  As he authorized this change to the Pledge of Allegiance he said:

“In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in America’s heritage and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country’s most powerful resource in peace and war.”

There is no other Nation upon this planet that invokes the name of God and His Truths more that the United States of America has, and now today, she is under attack from the very ones who have professed to be her protectors and guardian Patriots.

We are not a Multicultural Nation, however, we are an American Culture and we must forever remain united maintaining Her, we must insure that foreign influences are kept out of our most highest offices at all cost no matter the personal sacrifices we must make or the suffering we must endure.

How do you make what is already very clear any clearer, and how can you possibly make what is already easily understandable any more understood…

Either Cruz supporters are deliberately, purposefully ignoring Constitutional Truths or they’re not aware of them…

So then begs the question, why purposefully alter the Natural Course of our Nation, and or, why ignore the warnings from others who have clearly given cause for its attention?

I can’t tell you the many I have debated on this issue who have responded by saying, I don’t know if Cruz is eligible or not, but he’s a great guy and he cares about us and he is our only chance to change this Nations Course.

CHANGE We Can Count On…..

Dear sweet mother may I, does this sound reminisce to the song, Barack Hussein Obama MMMM Good, Hes the One, Barack Obama, he is “The Chosen One” MMMM Good!

Think about that for a moment, let it soak deep down into your souls…

We will pay a horrible price for ONCE AGAIN betraying Principled truths and ignoring them, for betraying what is right because we didn’t trust the goodness that would come from our making the right decisions…

So Much For FAITH that we would turn our backs on Gods truths, and make no mistake, all truths are born of God….

If I sound rhetorical your mistaken….This is confusion combined with my anger at those who once stood beside me on Constitutional Principles who are now themselves betraying them…

Betraying their principles of all else for a self drivin POLITICIAN who clearly knows he is not eligible for the Presidency of the United States of America, and who is clearly trampling the very same Constitution he took an oath to Protect and Uphold…

What infuriates me about this guy Cruz and his supporters are….He is clearly, unquestionably INELIGIBLE and we are opening far to many doors to foreign influences that will see the death of this Nation if we dare go further…

Blood & Soil. The Revolutionary Nationalism that our Forefathers and Framers fought and died for to insure that the freedoms and liberty’s they secured for us, would be granted to their many generations to come…They were forever to go unchallenged.

But apparently, the voting block on the right of our isle doesn’t seem to care…Worse yet, they are willfully surrendering themselves over to those they are Hero Worshiping that could care less about them or this Nation and its made apparent in their deliberate and overt disregard to Constitutional Law.,.

Sadly, I get angry responses like, Obama got elected so why not Ted Cruz, they got their guy, so why can’t we elect ours, not realizing the implications of their rhetoric.

This opens far to many doors to foreign powers within our Government, case in Point, BARACK OBAMA and the Muslim’s he has in his administration are the very sort of influences the Framers made sure to keep out, that the voters have now allowed in…

My sweet Jesus, we have never seen anything like destruction we are witnessing today of our Nation and yet, we have not learned anything from Obama, not one thing….We are self driven by emotions and lack of faith instead of the Truth, Gods truth that goodness comes from those who follow His Natural Laws..His Principled Laws…

We Christians often invoke God’s name and say the Constitution is founded on Christian values and principles, yet we betray them….What does that say about us and what does it say of who we have become?

Then there are the 12-20 million Illegal Aliens congress is wanting to give Amnesty to….Because they too are betraying Constitutional Law.

What this does and why I am dead set against it is, that Amnesty grants IMMEDIATE CITIZENSHIP to all of America’s entitlements and privileges….

Here’s the bothersome part, if not the latter weren’t already, their children under the redefinition gifted to Ted Cruz of his Natural Born status will also as a FACT, GRANT each and every one of their ANCHOR baby’s immediate UNCONSTITUTIONAL Natural Born Statuses through their parents amnestied [CITIZENSHIP], thus allowing them to be ELIGIBLE for the Presidency of the United States of this America if they so choose to be when they become of age, and nothing can be done to stop them if and when it ever does come to our attention that we had made a very horrible mistake.

Just as they had done with the 1790 Naturalization Act they had to later repeal….

It will have by then become to late and or to forgotten to even address the illegality of their bid for the Presidency to matter and CONSERVATIVE VOTERS are either unaware of this, or, they just simply don’t care, this is their guy and be damned all else including and especially their CONSTITUTION to get him elected…

Why this matters…., once we have FOREIGN Influences in our WHITE HOUSE then this opens up yet another door to WORLD POWERS, thus the beginning of the New World Order and the END of our Republic and we will have allowed this ourselves, we will been the very ones who opened those doors.

We, The People.

All, so we could win an election and the sad part is, we have other winnable viable electable Candidates, other ultra Conservatives that can easily beat Hilary hands down….

If Ted Cruz is nominated, the Left will throw an all in or lose campaign to make him INELIGIBLE and it will cost us yet another election because we stood by yet another lesser evil another Usurper….

The U.S. Constitution provides as follows:

Article II Section 1 Clause 5:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

A statutory citizen (bestowed by man’s pen) can never be a “natural born” citizen (bestowed by God/nature)…Blood & Soil.

Every child born on US SOIL is a US Citizen…., but not all are “natural born citizens”

One needs to be Born on US SOIL.…and have…. “TWO CITIZEN PARENTS” at the time of Birth.

Supreme Court Cases that Cite : “Natural Born Citizen” as One Born on U.S. Soil to Citizen Parents

•Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)

•Shanks v DuPont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830)

•Dred Scott v Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)

•Minor v Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875)

•United States v Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

•Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)

The Sad Thing is..

Both Party’s know this…They’re both in on the same deal to keep a “President” in the White House that can circumvent our Constitution…Or…outside of it>>>>Foreign Powers.

There’s not a one of us who doesn’t already know this to be absolutely true, case in point, unconstitutional same sex marriages and forcing bakers and farmers to bake cakes and perform same sex marriages as just a few of the many acts already suffered upon us because we allowed exceptions to Constitutional Law.

This is… The Willful Subversion of America’s Founding Document’s, By Both Sides of the Isle…

Politicians aren’t the problem, its the idiots who are electing them that are….

We still need you at the Protest site – Its not over || by Carol Bundy

Image Added by Jericho777

Hi again,

I just want to be very clear, we need to maintain a large crowd at the protest site in order to keep the media focused on this issue.

You know how they are, the second they think the public has lost interest they will run away to find a car wreck to put on TV.

PLEASE come and be with us at the protest site.  We love that we have the cows back but we need to put a stop the way the Federal Government is treating all of us who love the land.

We really need a lot of people here every day.

Love you,


PS- PLEASE Pass this on to your friends

      Oh, and remember that if you don’t see it here, or on our blog http://bundyranch.blogspot.com/ its probably not true.

If you are not on this subscriber list go to http://bit.do/bundy