Trey Gowdy, Betrays the Constitution to Support Marco Rubio’s Ineligibility, As are many other Americans


And another Champion of the People and Constitution bites the Dust,,,,There is no candidate who is more clearly defined as Ineligible than Marco Rubio, and Trey Gowdy knows it…

4a2b5afc0a2af7e2710f386230f00f00

Neither Marco Rubio nor Bobby Jindals parents were American Citizens at the time of their births….I am so tired of seeing our Constitution Battered and Neglected in this Manner, if our Constitution is destroyed, than so will all our other Protections be destroyed…

All of our Protections people, including our precious and very fragile freedoms along with it.

Add in the Ineligible Ted Cruz and we have the makings for future Foreign Presidents….Don’t think so, than your a blind fool, that or terribly misinformed or outright compliant to our Nations destruction.

Why, for what other reason would any of you want to make allowances for Marco Rubio and those like himself except for your enabling them to further destroy this Nation and mind you, all of you….The Constitution of  The United States of America was not set up, structured, constructed and sealed AROUND each and every AMERICAN to protect THEM only, but to also protect this NATION from our enemies and from especially outside INFLUENCES that might destroy us from WITHIN, thus meaning FOREIGN Intrusions into our highest offices of the Presidency and Vice Presidency, our House and Senate which are all protected by these very FRAGILE PIECES of FOUNDING DOCUMENTS….

You and I, the American People, PATRIOTS all, are the Backbone of our CONSTITUTION  and we are seriously BROKEN…

Can you understand what “WE ARE BROKEN” means to us?

That Americans are the ones making these allowances, We the People, America’s Patriot’s are, and many others will soon follow our lead…Have they not already followed Barack Obama’s?

Once these allowances are made for those who are ineligible, no one will ever be able to challenge them again and that will have very serious and unprecedented consequences upon each and everyone of us as Americans and our Nation and especially our future generations, what we allow now will in fact impact their lives dramatically.

And we can stop the wrongful usurpation of this Nation today, its so insanely easy, simply don’t support them, don’t vote for them, let them know the reason you aren’t voting for or supporting them is because they do not meet our Framers requirements for the Presidency and make it known LOUD and clear so that other INELIGIBLE CANDIDATES know that as  her first and last Defenders American Patriots will not tolerate nor support their INELIGIBILITY.

CLOSE THIS DOOR and SEAL IT CLOSED TODAY, RIGHT NOW…!!!!

Close it now before this goes any further or mark my words, not only will you be culpable to your own destruction, but also the destruction of your family’s, your neighbors and this Nation’s security, as well as our future generations of Americans.

Has not Obama or his actions given any of you, any of you, a clear enough understanding or insight into what would follow after him if we continued to make allowances for ineligible candidates, redefining the requirements our Framers set in stone for our future Presidents eligibility?

Obama’s INELIGIBILITY has ENCOURAGE others with the same status to run for our highest office because they too think they can get away with it, and thus far, they have, and our corrupted do nothing traitorous Congress has cleared the path for him and that alone should concern all of you,  why would they enable Obama, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio to circumvent CONSTITUTIONAL LAW?

Why aren’t you Americans asking yourself that, or do you even care any more?

Where in our History has so many questionable Candidates ran for office, and at what time in our history has so many Ineligible candidates ran for our highest offices and don’t you for a moment suspect that something is amiss, that this comes right after Obama’s Illegal Presidency?

This is being Encouraged and you Americans, many of you God fearing Patriots are Allowing it by supporting them….

STOP IT, for the love of this Nation, STOP & THINK…Please research this for yourself.

If we continue to allow this, It won’t be long until we have Foreign President’s ruling over our children making law…THAT”S RIGHT, MAKING LAW, and don’t any of you dare tell me that will never happen when we have an Ineligible President now who is occupying our White House already, and he is MAKING LAWS that are aimed against AMERICANS and are favoring our Enemies….,don’t you even dare…

AND THAT MY DEAR PRECIOUS FRIENDS, are what they want, people who can work outside of our Constitution, the very same Constitution that many of you have professed you would die to protect, the very same document that many have already made the ultimate sacrifice for and the very same DOCUMENT you are now helping to destroy by allowing these Unconstitutional Exceptions into our highest offices….WHY??

NO ONE, not the President, not Congress, not the Senate nor Supreme Courts or States can change any of the wording within our Constitution to make them mean anything less than what our Founders interpreted them to mean….No Person or Persons have the Power to Do That.

So I have to ask, why are you trying to?

Am I to understand now that our Constitution is meaningless any more… Is that what you Patriots are Saying today?

Because that’s exactly what I am hearing and reading everywhere I go by the Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio supporters, as well as Bobby Jindals supporters before he stepped down, and if it doesn’t matter to you, then that breaks my heart…

Because, how can any of you who are supporting these Ineligible Candidates turn right around and honor and celebrate this Nation, our Constitution, Her Heroes and Veterans who sacrificed so much to protect this Nation and our Constitution with their lives, when you are now culpable in its very destruction…..

And, your doing it with a STRAIGHT FACE?

Blood & Soil, Descent & Territory = Natural Born

Anyone who is made a Citizen through an Act of Law is Naturalized…Not Natural Born.

People are mistaking Citizens at Birth with Natural Born, nor will they differentiate Citizen at Birth from Natural Born….

All Natural Born Natives are Citizens at Birth….
However, not all Citizens at Birth are Natural Born…

Anyone who is made a Citizen through an ACT of Law is a Naturalized Citizen and is not eligible for the Presidency.

A Natural Born Citizen would not have to renounce another Citizenship….Ted Cruz has.

One must be born upon American Soil to TWO Parents who are BOTH AMERICAN CITIZENS…To Meet The Natural Born Requirements to become eligible for the Presidency…

Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jindal nor had Obama met any of these Requirements for the Presidency, and they never will.

That Is A Fact, You Cannot Change Constitutional Law.

What we are seeing today with Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio as was the case of Barack OBAMA… IS,,,,The Willful Subversion of America’s Founding Document’s, By Both Sides of the Isle, and many of you are playing right into their hands!

Read Here: Trey Gowdy Twists Natural Born Citizen Qualification to Support Marco Rubio

http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/12/trey-gowdy-twists-natural-born-citizen-qualification-to-support-marco-rubio/

Sources:

Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defines a Natural Born Citizen in1789 In defining an [Article II “natural born Citizen]…

http://www.scribd.com/…/Founder-and-Historian-David...

 

Defining Natural-Born Citizen by P.A. Madison on November 18th, 2008

http://www.federalistblog.us/…/natural-born_citizen…/

 

 

http://www.federalistblog.us/…/natural-born_citizen_defined/

 

Source: Attorney Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

March 13, 2015 http://puzo1.blogspot.com

 

 

Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defined Natural Born Citizenship in 1789 – by Atty Mario Apuzzo

http://www.scribd.com/…/Founder-and-Historian-David-Ramsay-…

 

A Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What & For How Long?

https://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/a-congressi…/

 

The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/natural-born-citizen-clause-req…

 

Senator Ted Cruz Is Not a “Natural Born Citizen” and Therefore Not Eligible to Be President

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/senator-ted-cruz-is-not-natural…

 

The Fallacies of Congressional Legislative Attorney Jack Maskell’s Definition of a “Natural Born Citizen”

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/the-fallacies-of-congressional.…

 

Birthright Citizenship in the United States: A Global Comparison

http://www.cis.org/birthright-...

 

See: Publius Huldah’s important article on this subject…http://newswithviews.com/Publius/huldah110.htm

 

 

Defining Natural-Born Citizen: The Debate Over Who Qualifies To Run For President…http://ivn.us/2013/08/13/defining-natural-born-citizen/

 

 

Truth, the Whole Truth, & Nothing but the Truth – Cruz Control…

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2015/03/25/truth-the-whole-truth-nothing-but-the-truth-cruz-control/

 

 

Cruz Control – Part II

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2015/03/27/cruz-control-part-ii/

 

 

Obama never certified by Hawaii Democratic Party

https://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/obama-never-certified-by-hawaii-democratic-party/

 

Absolute Proof the Founders Knew and Accepted Vattel`s French “naturels” to mean “natural born” in English Before Constitution Was Written…

https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

 

Trees are plants but not all plants are trees. “natural born Citizens (NBC)” are “Citizens at birth (CAB)” but not all “CAB” are “NBC”!

https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/trees-are-plants-but-not-all-plants-are-trees-natural-born-citizens-nbc-are-citizens-at-birth-cab-but-not-all-cab-are-nbc/

 

John Jay’s letter to George Washington dated 25 Jul 1787:

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/…/is-being-born-citizen-of...

ny_1789_jay

1775 Benjamin Franklin Wrote Vatel

A Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What & For How Long?

https://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/a-congressional-natural-born-citizen-parts-i-ii-iii/

 

CVJ5dUOUAAAWQt4.jpg large

 

Presidential Eligibility Tutorial

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

 

 

7 FAM 1131.6-3 …Not Citizens by “Naturalization”

(CT:CON-474; 08-19-2013) http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf

 

US Constitution

 

Cruz, Obama, Rubio nor Jindal meet any of these requirements…

 

Excellent article: Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/07/natural-born-citizen-matter-republicans-democrats/#3eTYHl4oG1Fsxbmj.99

 

Constitutional Qualifications  House of Representatives

4 Supreme Court Cases define “natural born citizen” | The Post & Email

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/

 

Vatel Eligibilty Natural Born

4 SUPREME COURT CASES DEFINE ‘NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'(Updated May 25, 2012) http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/news.php?q=1308252582

 

 

 1790 Nationality Act repealed by the 1795 Immigration act

Check out sections 3 (correction of definition) -and- 4 (repeal of 1790 act).

http://www.indiana.edu/~kdhist/H105-documents-web/week08/naturalization1790.html

 

 

June 11, 2003, Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Ark., brought HJR 59. It was intended to “permit persons who are not natural born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 35 years, to be eligible to hold the offices of president and vice president.”

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:H.J.Res59:

 

 

Sept. 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., brought HJR67, which would have done the same as Snyder’s, only the requirement to be a citizen was lowered to 20 years.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:H.J.Res67:

 

 

Feb. 25, 2004, Sen. Don Nickles, R-Okla., brought S.B. 2128 to “try to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural born citizen requirement.” But it defined NBC as someone who was born in and is subject to the United States,” which was not the understanding of the framers of the Constitution.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:S2128:

 

 

Sept. 15, 2004, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., brought HJR 104, “to make eligible for the office of president a person who is not a natural born citizen of the United States but has been a United States citizen for at least 20 years.”

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:H.J.Res104:

 

 

Jan. 4, 2005, Conyers, D-Mich., HJR2, the same as Rohrabacher’s.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:H.J.RES.2:

 

 

 

Feb. 1, 2005, HJR15, Rohrabacher, to require only 20 years citizenship to be eligible for the office of president.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:H.J.Res15:

 

 

April 14, 2005, Snyder, HJR42, requiring 35 years’ citizenship.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:H.J.Res42:

 

 

 

Feb. 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., tried to attach to SB 2678, Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act, an amendment clarifying what “natural-born citizen” includes. Obama and then-Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., were sponsors.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:S2678:

 

 

 

Sen. John McCain’s qualifications as a “natural-born citizen.”

 

 

 

 

References – internet links to documents for determining types of citizenship
http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel_01.htm

 

 

 

 

Law of Nations
§ 213. Inhabitants.

“The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners, who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound to the society by their residence, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside in it; and they are obliged to defend it, because it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the rights of citizens. They enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. The perpetual inhabitants are those who have received the right of perpetual residence. These are a kind of citizens of an inferior order, and are united to the society without participating in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their fathers; and, as the state has given to these the right of perpetual residence, their right passes to their posterity.”

“U.S. national is a person born in or having ties with “an outlying possession of the United States” which is as of 2005, only American Samoa and Swains Island.

Additionally, it also includes those individuals born abroad to two U.S. national parents, or those born abroad to one alien parent and one U.S. national parent. Additionally, there is a residency requirement for the parents of the child prior to birth in order to transmit U.S. nationality. “

Rights and Restrictions

Restrictions
U.S. nationals cannot vote in any election or hold elected office.

Rights
•Allowed to work and reside anywhere in the U.S. without restrictions.
•Eligible to apply for U.S. passport just like U.S. citizens. In fact, there is no difference between the passport for U.S. national and U.S. citizen. Both of them mention the ‘Nationality – USA’.
•Eligible to apply for U.S. citizenship through naturalization under the same rules as other permanent residents.

http://www.immihelp.com/immigration/us-national.html

 

 

 

 

Summary: Throughout U.S. history, various authorities have expressed the viewpoint that birthplace alone determines federal citizenship. Except for Lynch v. Clarke (1844), case law does not support this viewpoint. In Lynch v. Clarke, Vice-Chancellor Sandford ruled that Julia Lynch was a New York State citizen at birth, even though her parents were not citizens at the time of her birth. In his dicta, the Vice-Chancellor expressed his (non-legally-binding) opinion that Miss Lynch, in addition to being a citizen, was also a natural born citizen. The fact that Miss Lynch was deemed to be a natural born citizen according to a State judge’s dicta does not necessarily mean that she was a natural born citizen under the Federal Constitution Cici, Lynch v. Clarke was decided in New York state court. It is not binding in Federal matters.

 

 

Of particular note is that it was cited by Justice Gray in the case of US v. Wong Kim Ark and yet Justice Gray still did not declare Wong Kim Ark to be a “natural born citizen”, but simply a citizen by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment.

 

 

 

Perkins v. Elg is actually a good case to reference. In it, Justice Hughes indicates that both Marie Elg and “young Steinkauler”, both of whom were born on US soil to naturalized US citizen parents, were natural born citizens.

 

 

 

Ankeny v. Gov. Daniels also was a state case and consequently is not binding in Federal court. I would also point out that it was wrongly decided, but that’s another matter.

 

 

 

In 1898, Supreme Court Justice Gray in delivering the majority opinion in the case of US v Wong Kim Ark stated “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, … by authority of Congress, exercised … by declaring certain classes of persons to be citizens, as in the enactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens …” [See: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649] That statement clearly indicates that children of citizens who are born outside US Territory, who gain their citizenship by Congressional statute are naturalized. In other words, simply having citizen parents isn’t enough to make a natural born citizen!

 

 

In 1951, Chief Judge Phillips in delivering the opinion in the case of Zimmer v. Acheson for the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit said of someone who was born outside the United States to two US citizen parents, acquiring their citizenship under Revised Statutes § 1993 (the precursor of todays 8 USC 1401), that the nature of their citizenship “status as a citizen was that of a naturalized citizen and not a native-born citizen.” [See: https://www.courtlistener.com/…/zimmer-v-acheson…/…]

 

 

 

In 1956, Judge Hamley, in delivering the opinion in the case of Wong Kam Wo v. Dulles for the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in a case pertaining to two men born outside the United States to a naturalized US citizen father, noted that Revised Statutes § 1993 (the precursor of todays 8 USC 1401) is “a naturalization law in the constitutional sense.” [See: https://www.courtlistener.com/…/wong-kam-wo-and…/…]

 

 

 

And in 1971, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, who just 4 years earlier had written the majority opinion in the case of Afroyim v. Rusk, had the following observation to make of foreign-born children of US citizens; “Although those Americans who acquire their citizenship under statutes conferring citizenship on the foreign-born children of citizens are not popularly thought of as naturalized citizens, the use of the word “naturalize” in this way has a considerable constitutional history. Congress is empowered by the Constitution to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” Art. I, 8. Anyone acquiring citizenship solely under the exercise of this power is, constitutionally speaking, a naturalized citizen.”

 

 

 

The position of the courts for well over a century is that foreign born children of US citizens who acquire their citizenship wholly through Congressional statutes or by Act of Law are “naturalized” citizens. Not, Natural Born Citizens and not Eligible for the Presidency or Vice Presidency.

Self Preservation Party

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s